ASTS vs. CCJ
ASTS (AST SpaceMobile, Inc.) and CCJ (Cameco Corporation) are both stocks. ASTS operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while CCJ operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 5 years, ASTS returned 54.02%/yr vs 37.97%/yr for CCJ. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASTS vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASTS achieves a 26.75% return, which is significantly higher than CCJ's 15.25% return.
ASTS
- 1D
- -1.65%
- 1M
- 22.66%
- YTD
- 26.75%
- 6M
- 24.41%
- 1Y
- 195.16%
- 3Y*
- 152.04%
- 5Y*
- 54.02%
- 10Y*
- —
CCJ
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -9.69%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 6M
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 74.85%
- 3Y*
- 51.07%
- 5Y*
- 37.97%
- 10Y*
- 25.85%
ASTS vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | 26.75% | 244.22% | 249.92% | 25.10% | -39.29% | -41.53% | 37.59% | 1.02% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 15.25% | 78.38% | 19.47% | 90.49% | 4.35% | 63.19% | 51.47% | -2.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASTS and CCJ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, ASTS and CCJ have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
ASTS:
$26.76B
CCJ:
$45.93B
ASTS:
-$1.84
CCJ:
$1.49
ASTS:
287.63
CCJ:
12.97
ASTS:
10.06
CCJ:
6.49
ASTS:
$84.94M
CCJ:
$3.54B
ASTS:
-$22.93M
CCJ:
$1.04B
ASTS:
-$536.80M
CCJ:
$996.66M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASTS vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank
ASTS
CCJ
ASTS vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASTS | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.25 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.12 | 2.93 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.15 | 6.51 | +1.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASTS | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 1.35 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.77 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.23 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
ASTS vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASTS drawdown since its inception was -91.07%, roughly equal to the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASTS and CCJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASTS | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.07% | -87.53% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.69% | -25.69% | -22.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.66% | -40.01% | -30.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.57% | -40.01% | -45.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.83% | -21.37% | -9.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.38% | -46.09% | +2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.06% | 11.54% | +12.52% |
Volatility
ASTS vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) has a higher volatility of 40.76% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 15.98%. This indicates that ASTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASTS | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 40.76% | 15.98% | +24.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 82.89% | 39.04% | +43.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.86% | 55.87% | +48.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.43% | 49.87% | +59.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.53% | 46.69% | +53.84% |
Dividends
ASTS vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
ASTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASTS AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 4.33% | 3.82% | 3.24% |
Financials
ASTS vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AST SpaceMobile, Inc. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ASTS and CCJ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASTS has higher volatility (40.76%) compared to CCJ (15.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASTS dropped -91.07% vs CCJ's -87.53%.
ASTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASTS and CCJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer