PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASTS vs. ARLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ASTS vs. ARLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASTS achieves a 48.33% return, which is significantly higher than ARLP's 14.82% return.


ASTS

1D
-8.83%
1M
57.43%
YTD
48.33%
6M
75.34%
1Y
327.84%
3Y*
167.63%
5Y*
67.26%
10Y*

ARLP

1D
-0.35%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
14.82%
6M
12.17%
1Y
7.68%
3Y*
25.72%
5Y*
45.72%
10Y*
15.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASTS vs. ARLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ASTS
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
48.33%244.22%249.92%25.10%-39.29%-41.53%37.59%1.02%
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
14.82%-2.45%39.91%18.83%73.34%195.75%-56.80%-6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ASTS and ARLP is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ASTS:

$31.32B

ARLP:

$3.27B

EPS

ASTS:

-$1.84

ARLP:

$72.64

PS Ratio

ASTS:

336.59

ARLP:

0.01

PB Ratio

ASTS:

11.77

ARLP:

1.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

ASTS:

$84.94M

ARLP:

$517.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ASTS:

-$22.93M

ARLP:

$353.56M

EBITDA (TTM)

ASTS:

-$536.80M

ARLP:

$82.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASTS vs. ARLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASTS
ASTS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ASTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ASTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASTS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ARLP
ARLP Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ARLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARLP Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ARLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARLP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASTS vs. ARLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASTSARLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.08

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.93

0.44

+6.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.81

0.83

+12.98

ASTS vs. ARLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASTS Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is higher than the ARLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASTS and ARLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASTSARLPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15

0.34

+2.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

1.36

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.37

+0.07

Drawdowns

ASTS vs. ARLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASTS drawdown since its inception was -91.07%, roughly equal to the maximum ARLP drawdown of -90.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASTS and ARLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASTSARLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.07%

-90.52%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.69%

-17.62%

-30.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.66%

-20.83%

-49.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.57%

-29.13%

-56.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.05%

-10.24%

-8.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.41%

-24.34%

-19.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.88%

9.28%

+14.60%

Volatility

ASTS vs. ARLP - Volatility Comparison

AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) has a higher volatility of 40.51% compared to Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) at 5.78%. This indicates that ASTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASTSARLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

40.51%

5.78%

+34.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

83.96%

15.70%

+68.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.86%

22.63%

+82.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

111.63%

33.82%

+77.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

100.49%

50.24%

+50.25%

Dividends

ASTS vs. ARLP - Dividend Comparison

ASTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.45%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.
9.45%11.19%10.65%13.22%7.38%3.16%8.93%19.82%11.94%9.54%8.85%19.74%
ASTS
AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ASTS vs. ARLP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AST SpaceMobile, Inc. and Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00B200.00B300.00B400.00B500.00B20222023202420252026
14.74M
516.02B
(ASTS) Total Revenue
(ARLP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ASTS and ARLP have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASTS has higher volatility (40.51%) compared to ARLP (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASTS dropped -91.07% vs ARLP's -90.52%.

ASTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASTS and ARLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer