ARLP vs. CRK
ARLP (Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.) and CRK (Comstock Resources, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — ARLP in Thermal Coal, CRK in Oil & Gas E&P. Over the past 10 years, ARLP returned 12.92%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for CRK. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ARLP vs. CRK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARLP achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly higher than CRK's -42.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ARLP having a 12.92% annualized return and CRK not far ahead at 12.94%.
ARLP
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 11.05%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 1Y
- 8.11%
- 3Y*
- 21.88%
- 5Y*
- 41.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.60%
CRK
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -8.65%
- 6M
- -39.13%
- YTD
- -42.15%
- 1Y
- -18.28%
- 3Y*
- 3.94%
- 5Y*
- 19.85%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.12M | $6.11M | $7.52M | |
| $35.48M | $33.85M | $38.85M |
ARLP vs. CRK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARLP Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. | 18.03% | -2.45% | 39.91% | 18.83% | 73.34% | 195.75% | -56.80% | -28.90% | -1.90% | -4.04% |
CRK Comstock Resources, Inc. | -42.15% | 27.22% | 105.88% | -32.37% | 70.63% | 85.13% | -46.90% | 81.68% | -46.45% | -14.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARLP and CRK is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 1999 | 0.31 |
The correlation between ARLP and CRK shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ARLP:
$3.36B
CRK:
$3.94B
ARLP:
$2.07
CRK:
$1.84
ARLP:
12.60
CRK:
7.30
ARLP:
0.28
CRK:
0.04
ARLP:
1.54
CRK:
2.08
ARLP:
0.00
CRK:
1.52
ARLP:
$2.17B
CRK:
$1.89B
ARLP:
$613.22M
CRK:
$1.23B
ARLP:
$650.79M
CRK:
$1.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARLP vs. CRK — Risk / Return Rank
ARLP
CRK
ARLP vs. CRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) and Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARLP | CRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.98 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | -0.34 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.94 | -0.61 | +1.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARLP vs. CRK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARLP drawdown since its inception was -90.52%, smaller than the maximum CRK drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARLP and CRK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARLP | CRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.52% | -99.32% | +8.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.92% | -54.77% | +37.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.83% | -59.73% | +38.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.13% | -64.25% | +35.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.26% | -68.63% | -16.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.73% | -96.55% | +88.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.26% | -62.76% | +38.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.62% | 30.02% | -21.40% |
Volatility
ARLP vs. CRK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) is 5.29%, while Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) has a volatility of 13.84%. This indicates that ARLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARLP | CRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 13.84% | -8.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.80% | 38.95% | -22.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.03% | 54.55% | -31.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.68% | 58.22% | -25.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.66% | 66.50% | -16.84% |
Dividends
ARLP vs. CRK - Dividend Comparison
ARLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%, while CRK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARLP Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. | 9.19% | 11.19% | 10.65% | 13.22% | 7.38% | 3.16% | 8.93% | 19.82% | 11.94% | 9.54% | 8.85% | 19.74% |
CRK Comstock Resources, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.65% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ARLP vs. CRK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. and Comstock Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ARLP vs. CRK - Profitability Comparison
ARLP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 202.70M and revenue of 551.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
CRK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 317.94M and revenue of 353.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.0%.
ARLP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 95.59M and revenue of 551.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.
CRK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.58M and revenue of 353.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
ARLP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 79.56M and revenue of 551.56M, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.
CRK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported a net income of 9.33M and revenue of 353.28M, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARLP and CRK have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRK has higher volatility (13.84%) compared to ARLP (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARLP dropped -90.52% vs CRK's -99.32%.
ARLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARLP and CRK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer