ARLP vs. CRK
ARLP (Alliance Resource Partners, L.P.) and CRK (Comstock Resources, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — ARLP in Thermal Coal, CRK in Oil & Gas E&P. Over the past 10 years, ARLP returned 14.94%/yr vs 13.46%/yr for CRK. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARLP vs. CRK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARLP achieves a 10.94% return, which is significantly higher than CRK's -41.93% return. Over the past 10 years, ARLP has outperformed CRK with an annualized return of 14.94%, while CRK has yielded a comparatively lower 13.46% annualized return.
ARLP
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 10.94%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 24.03%
- 5Y*
- 41.47%
- 10Y*
- 14.94%
CRK
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -3.44%
- YTD
- -41.93%
- 6M
- -41.63%
- 1Y
- -54.70%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 16.31%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
ARLP vs. CRK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARLP Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. | 10.94% | -2.45% | 39.91% | 18.83% | 73.34% | 195.75% | -56.80% | -28.90% | -1.90% | -4.04% |
CRK Comstock Resources, Inc. | -41.93% | 27.22% | 105.88% | -32.37% | 70.63% | 85.13% | -46.90% | 81.68% | -46.45% | -14.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARLP and CRK is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 1999 | 0.31 |
The correlation between ARLP and CRK shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ARLP:
$3.16B
CRK:
$3.92B
ARLP:
$72.64
CRK:
$2.23
ARLP:
0.34
CRK:
6.05
ARLP:
0.01
CRK:
0.03
ARLP:
0.01
CRK:
1.97
ARLP:
1.53
CRK:
1.42
ARLP:
$517.67B
CRK:
$2.01B
ARLP:
$353.56M
CRK:
$1.01B
ARLP:
$82.91B
CRK:
$1.62B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARLP vs. CRK — Risk / Return Rank
ARLP
CRK
ARLP vs. CRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) and Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARLP | CRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.83 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | -0.96 | +1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.50 | -1.52 | +2.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARLP vs. CRK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARLP drawdown since its inception was -90.52%, smaller than the maximum CRK drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARLP and CRK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARLP | CRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.52% | -99.32% | +8.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.63% | -57.15% | +39.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.83% | -58.78% | +37.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.13% | -64.25% | +35.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.26% | -68.63% | -16.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.28% | -96.54% | +83.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.31% | -62.65% | +38.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.68% | 36.34% | -26.66% |
Volatility
ARLP vs. CRK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (ARLP) is 7.11%, while Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) has a volatility of 13.63%. This indicates that ARLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARLP | CRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.11% | 13.63% | -6.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.51% | 40.97% | -24.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.33% | 57.48% | -34.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.43% | 58.19% | -24.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.19% | 68.11% | -17.92% |
Dividends
ARLP vs. CRK - Dividend Comparison
ARLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.78%, while CRK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARLP Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. | 9.78% | 11.19% | 10.65% | 13.22% | 7.38% | 3.16% | 8.93% | 19.82% | 11.94% | 9.54% | 8.85% | 19.74% |
CRK Comstock Resources, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.65% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ARLP vs. CRK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. and Comstock Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ARLP vs. CRK - Profitability Comparison
ARLP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 516.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CRK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 548.65M and revenue of 587.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.4%.
ARLP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 21.86B and revenue of 516.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
CRK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 174.89M and revenue of 587.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.8%.
ARLP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 9.09B and revenue of 516.02B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
CRK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comstock Resources, Inc. reported a net income of 136.48M and revenue of 587.35M, resulting in a net margin of 23.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARLP and CRK have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRK has higher volatility (13.63%) compared to ARLP (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARLP dropped -90.52% vs CRK's -99.32%.
ARLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARLP and CRK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer