PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASTI vs. CRML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ASTI vs. CRML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ascent Solar Technologies Inc. (ASTI) and Critical Metals Corp (CRML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASTI achieves a -29.20% return, which is significantly lower than CRML's -20.89% return.


ASTI

1D
-4.90%
1M
-34.31%
6M
-41.68%
YTD
-29.20%
1Y
73.21%
3Y*
-87.74%
5Y*
-92.81%
10Y*
-76.25%
ALL TIME*
-70.38%

CRML

1D
-1.26%
1M
-42.57%
6M
-58.31%
YTD
-20.89%
1Y
44.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-18.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.07M$1.37M$9.32M
$35.75M$39.93M$77.94M

ASTI vs. CRML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ASTI
Ascent Solar Technologies Inc.
-29.20%25.69%-94.17%
CRML
Critical Metals Corp
-20.89%2.21%-24.64%

Correlation

The correlation between ASTI and CRML is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024

0.15

The correlation between ASTI and CRML shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ASTI:

$10.12M

CRML:

$512.97M

Total Revenue (TTM)

ASTI:

$113.09K

CRML:

$560.62K

Gross Profit (TTM)

ASTI:

-$757.46K

CRML:

$560.62K

EBITDA (TTM)

ASTI:

-$7.98M

CRML:

-$47.47M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASTI vs. CRML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ASTI
ASTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ASTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ASTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASTI Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

CRML
CRML Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CRML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRML Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRML Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CRML Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRML Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ASTI vs. CRML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ascent Solar Technologies Inc. (ASTI) and Critical Metals Corp (CRML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASTICRMLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.19

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

0.55

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.86

0.78

+1.08

ASTI vs. CRML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the CRML Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASTI and CRML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASTI vs. CRML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASTI drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than CRML's maximum drawdown of -93.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASTI and CRML.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASTICRMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-93.91%

-6.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.07%

-82.88%

+13.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-100.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-81.68%

-18.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.42%

-68.37%

-22.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.25%

58.68%

-24.43%

Volatility

ASTI vs. CRML - Volatility Comparison

Ascent Solar Technologies Inc. (ASTI) has a higher volatility of 25.80% compared to Critical Metals Corp (CRML) at 23.01%. This indicates that ASTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASTICRMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.80%

23.01%

+2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

110.80%

84.11%

+26.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

165.93%

155.87%

+10.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

162.36%

181.19%

-18.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8,953.10%

181.19%

+8,771.91%

Dividends

ASTI vs. CRML - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASTI nor CRML has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ASTI vs. CRML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ascent Solar Technologies Inc. and Critical Metals Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ASTI and CRML have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASTI has higher volatility (25.80%) compared to CRML (23.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASTI dropped -100.00% vs CRML's -93.91%.

ASTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASTI and CRML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer