ASML vs. SI=F
ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) is a stock, while SI=F (Silver Futures) is an asset. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASML vs. SI=F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASML
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 17.61%
- YTD
- 74.80%
- 6M
- 73.02%
- 1Y
- 146.81%
- 3Y*
- 37.59%
- 5Y*
- 22.97%
- 10Y*
- 36.00%
SI=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASML vs. SI=F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 74.80% | 56.51% | -7.70% | 39.91% | -14.19% |
SI=F Silver Futures | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASML and SI=F is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASML vs. SI=F — Risk / Return Rank
ASML
SI=F
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ASML vs. SI=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Silver Futures (SI=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASML | SI=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.08 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASML vs. SI=F - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASML | SI=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.12% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.63% | — | — |
Volatility
ASML vs. SI=F - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASML | SI=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.75% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.44% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.72% | — | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASML and SI=F have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ASML and SI=F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer