ASMG vs. CRWG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ASMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF) and CRWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

ASMG vs. CRWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMG achieves a 127.56% return, which is significantly higher than CRWG's 53.84% return.

ASMG

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: 49.91%
• YTD: 127.56%
• 6M: 96.41%
• 1Y: 308.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRWG

• 1D: -14.04%
• 1M: -28.24%
• YTD: 53.84%
• 6M: 13.19%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMG vs. CRWG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF	127.56%	100.11%
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	53.84%	-83.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMG and CRWG is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

ASMG vs. CRWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMG

ASMG Risk / Return Rank: 86
ASMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ASMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ASMG Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ASMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASMG Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMG vs. CRWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ASMG	CRWG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.83	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.99	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.40	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASMG	CRWG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.89	-0.42	+2.32

Drawdowns

ASMG vs. CRWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMG drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, smaller than the maximum CRWG drawdown of -89.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMG and CRWG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASMG	CRWG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.95%	-89.42%	+45.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-77.02%	+77.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.28%	-68.53%	+55.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.85%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASMG	CRWG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.17%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	64.23%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	81.15%	191.73%	-110.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	84.49%	191.73%	-107.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	84.49%	191.73%	-107.24%

ASMG vs. CRWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ASMG and CRWG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

ASMG vs. CRWG - Dividend Comparison

ASMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than CRWG's 4.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF	4.92%	11.20%
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	4.81%	7.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASMG and CRWG in my portfolio?

ASMG and CRWG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ASMG or CRWG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASMG or CRWG?

ASMG and CRWG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASMG or CRWG?

ASMG has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 4.81% for CRWG.