PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASMG vs. ASML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASMG vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMG achieves a 132.71% return, which is significantly higher than ASML's 66.82% return.


ASMG

1D
-15.76%
1M
13.68%
YTD
132.71%
6M
134.72%
1Y
284.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASML

1D
-7.82%
1M
8.91%
YTD
66.82%
6M
68.08%
1Y
129.88%
3Y*
37.97%
5Y*
21.90%
10Y*
35.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMG vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ASMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF
132.71%62.68%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
66.82%49.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMG and ASML is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025

1.00

The correlation between ASMG and ASML has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASMG vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMG
ASMG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ASMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML
ASML Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMG vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASMGASMLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.42

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.30

7.32

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.59

19.64

+0.95

ASMG vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASMG Sharpe Ratio is 3.28, which is comparable to the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASMG and ASML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASMG vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMG drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMG and ASML.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMGASMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.95%

-90.00%

+46.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.56%

-17.85%

-16.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.94%

-7.84%

-8.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.92%

-28.10%

+15.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.90%

6.64%

+7.26%

Volatility

ASMG vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) has a higher volatility of 37.34% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 18.58%. This indicates that ASMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASMGASMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.34%

18.58%

+18.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.58%

35.41%

+35.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.62%

43.81%

+43.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

87.74%

42.68%

+45.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

87.74%

38.80%

+48.94%

Dividends

ASMG vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

ASMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than ASML's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF
4.81%11.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.49%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, ASMG and ASML move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ASMG has higher volatility (37.34%) compared to ASML (18.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASMG dropped -43.95% vs ASML's -90.00%.

ASMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASMG and ASML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer