PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASMG vs. URAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASMG vs. URAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) and Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMG achieves a 176.24% return, which is significantly higher than URAA's -5.26% return.


ASMG

1D
-0.22%
1M
34.94%
YTD
176.24%
6M
182.30%
1Y
386.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

URAA

1D
-3.50%
1M
-11.18%
YTD
-5.26%
6M
-11.40%
1Y
21.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMG vs. URAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ASMG and URAA is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASMG vs. URAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMG
ASMG Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ASMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

URAA
URAA Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
URAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
URAA Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
URAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
URAA Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMG vs. URAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) and Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASMGURAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.12

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.26

0.37

+10.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.02

0.75

+27.27

ASMG vs. URAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASMG Sharpe Ratio is 4.52, which is higher than the URAA Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASMG and URAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASMG vs. URAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMG drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, smaller than the maximum URAA drawdown of -67.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMG and URAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMGURAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.95%

-67.45%

+23.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.56%

-59.83%

+25.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-52.29%

+52.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.91%

-27.83%

+14.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.87%

29.40%

-15.53%

Volatility

ASMG vs. URAA - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) and Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) have volatilities of 32.41% and 31.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASMGURAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.41%

31.84%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.33%

74.47%

-6.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.22%

95.79%

-9.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.79%

89.63%

-2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

86.79%

89.63%

-2.84%

ASMG vs. URAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than URAA's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASMG vs. URAA - Dividend Comparison

ASMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than URAA's 10.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ASMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF
4.06%11.20%0.00%
URAA
Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares
10.74%9.14%4.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASMG and URAA have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASMG has higher volatility (32.41%) compared to URAA (31.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASMG dropped -43.95% vs URAA's -67.45%.

On 1-year performance, ASMG leads with 386.21% vs 21.98% for URAA. On fees, ASMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, URAA has been the lower-risk option at 31.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ASMG has performed better with a 386.21% return vs 21.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ASMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for URAA.

URAA has the higher dividend yield at 10.74%, compared with 4.06% for ASMG.

ASMG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while URAA is Uranium. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ASMG and 1.28% for URAA.

ASMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASMG and URAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer