ASHX vs. MAGC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ASHX (Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF) and MAGC (Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF) are both China Equities funds. ASHX is passively managed, while MAGC is actively managed. ASHX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MAGC.

Performance

ASHX vs. MAGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ASHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAGC

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: -10.59%
• YTD: -26.28%
• 6M: -26.68%
• 1Y: -26.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASHX vs. MAGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	-26.28%	16.35%	-14.03%

Return for Risk

ASHX vs. MAGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MAGC

MAGC Risk / Return Rank: 2
MAGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MAGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
MAGC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
MAGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
MAGC Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASHX vs. MAGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASHX	MAGC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.98	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.41	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.85	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.69	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.40	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ASHX	MAGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-38.05%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-38.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-38.05%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-15.66%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	18.66%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASHX	MAGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.15%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.03%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	26.76%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	34.08%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	34.08%	—

ASHX vs. MAGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASHX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGC's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASHX vs. MAGC - Dividend Comparison

ASHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.38%	1.76%	0.84%	0.80%	1.78%	1.07%	2.48%	19.46%	2.91%
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	5.56%	4.10%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, ASHX or MAGC?

On fees, MAGC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASHX or MAGC?

MAGC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ASHX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASHX or MAGC?

MAGC has the higher dividend yield at 5.56%, compared with 0.00% for ASHX.

What is the main difference between ASHX and MAGC?

They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ASHX and 0.59% for MAGC.