PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASHX vs. ASHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASHX vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ASHX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASHS

1D
2.15%
1M
4.69%
YTD
23.25%
6M
27.23%
1Y
69.26%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
5.45%
10Y*
4.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASHX vs. ASHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASHX
Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.27%-13.59%-26.45%2.64%42.24%35.03%-27.51%20.14%
ASHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF
23.25%39.48%2.68%-10.03%-24.78%17.66%28.22%24.53%-35.91%7.90%

Correlation

The correlation between ASHX and ASHS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2015

0.63

The correlation between ASHX and ASHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ASHX vs. ASHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASHX
ASHS

Financial Services

19.6%
5.3%

Industrials

16.0%
18.7%

Consumer Defensive

14.3%
1.7%

Technology

14.1%
33.2%

Basic Materials

9.6%
16.5%

Healthcare

7.9%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
5.3%

Utilities

4.3%
2.3%

Energy

4.2%
2.2%

Communication Services

1.5%
1.3%

Real Estate

1.4%
0.5%

Financial Services

ASHX
19.6%
ASHS
5.3%

Industrials

ASHX
16.0%
ASHS
18.7%

Consumer Defensive

ASHX
14.3%
ASHS
1.7%

Technology

ASHX
14.1%
ASHS
33.2%

Basic Materials

ASHX
9.6%
ASHS
16.5%

Healthcare

ASHX
7.9%
ASHS
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ASHX
7.1%
ASHS
5.3%

Utilities

ASHX
4.3%
ASHS
2.3%

Energy

ASHX
4.2%
ASHS
2.2%

Communication Services

ASHX
1.5%
ASHS
1.3%

Real Estate

ASHX
1.4%
ASHS
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASHX vs. ASHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ASHS
ASHS Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ASHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHS Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASHX vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASHXASHSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.51

ASHX vs. ASHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASHX vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASHXASHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

Volatility

ASHX vs. ASHS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASHXASHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.60%

ASHX vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASHX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHS's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASHX vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASHX nor ASHS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.69%0.65%1.90%0.76%0.43%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.34%
ASHX
Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.38%1.76%0.84%0.80%1.78%1.07%2.48%19.46%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASHX and ASHS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASHX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASHX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHS.

ASHX and ASHS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

ASHX tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while ASHS tracks CSI 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ASHX and 0.65% for ASHS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASHX and ASHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer