ASHX vs. ASHS
ASHX (Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF) and ASHS (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF) are both China Equities funds from Deutsche Bank - ASHX tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion Index while ASHS tracks the CSI 500 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASHX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHS.
Performance
ASHX vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASHX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASHS
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 27.23%
- 1Y
- 69.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.55%
- 5Y*
- 5.45%
- 10Y*
- 4.33%
ASHX vs. ASHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% | -13.59% | -26.45% | 2.64% | 42.24% | 35.03% | -27.51% | 20.14% |
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 23.25% | 39.48% | 2.68% | -10.03% | -24.78% | 17.66% | 28.22% | 24.53% | -35.91% | 7.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASHX and ASHS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2015 | 0.63 |
The correlation between ASHX and ASHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ASHX vs. ASHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ASHX
ASHS
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
ASHX
ASHS
Industrials
ASHX
ASHS
Consumer Defensive
ASHX
ASHS
Technology
ASHX
ASHS
Basic Materials
ASHX
ASHS
Healthcare
ASHX
ASHS
Consumer Cyclical
ASHX
ASHS
Utilities
ASHX
ASHS
Energy
ASHX
ASHS
Communication Services
ASHX
ASHS
Real Estate
ASHX
ASHS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASHX vs. ASHS — Risk / Return Rank
ASHX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ASHS
ASHX vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASHX | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.96 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASHX vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASHX | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -69.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -28.86% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -48.49% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.48% | — |
Volatility
ASHX vs. ASHS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASHX | ASHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 23.19% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 26.57% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 25.60% | — |
ASHX vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHS's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASHX vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASHX nor ASHS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.65% | 1.90% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.34% |
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.80% | 1.78% | 1.07% | 2.48% | 19.46% | 2.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASHX and ASHS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASHX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASHX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHS.
ASHX and ASHS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ASHX tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while ASHS tracks CSI 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ASHX and 0.65% for ASHS.
Find the right allocation for ASHX and ASHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer