ASHS vs. KSTR
ASHS (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF) and KSTR (KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF) are both China Equities funds - ASHS tracks the CSI 500 Index while KSTR tracks the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ASHS returned 4.14%/yr vs -0.07%/yr for KSTR. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASHS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for KSTR.
Performance
ASHS vs. KSTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASHS achieves a 15.30% return, which is significantly lower than KSTR's 31.11% return.
ASHS
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 15.30%
- 6M
- 23.86%
- 1Y
- 59.58%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- 3.28%
KSTR
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 31.11%
- 6M
- 35.86%
- 1Y
- 82.70%
- 3Y*
- 15.82%
- 5Y*
- -0.07%
- 10Y*
- —
ASHS vs. KSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 15.30% | 39.48% | 2.68% | -10.03% | -24.78% | 14.34% |
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF | 31.11% | 42.82% | 6.12% | -17.93% | -38.51% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASHS and KSTR is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between ASHS and KSTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
ASHS vs. KSTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ASHS
KSTR
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
ASHS
KSTR
Industrials
ASHS
KSTR
Basic Materials
ASHS
KSTR
Healthcare
ASHS
KSTR
Financial Services
ASHS
KSTR
-
Consumer Cyclical
ASHS
KSTR
Energy
ASHS
KSTR
Communication Services
ASHS
KSTR
-
Consumer Defensive
ASHS
KSTR
-
Utilities
ASHS
KSTR
-
Real Estate
ASHS
KSTR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASHS vs. KSTR — Risk / Return Rank
ASHS
KSTR
ASHS vs. KSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASHS | KSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.65 | 2.34 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.35 | 2.99 | +0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.39 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | 4.71 | -0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.22 | 12.00 | +2.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASHS | KSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 2.34 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | -0.00 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | -0.01 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
ASHS vs. KSTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASHS drawdown since its inception was -69.90%, which is greater than KSTR's maximum drawdown of -66.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHS and KSTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASHS | KSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.90% | -66.46% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.03% | -17.70% | +3.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.13% | -41.55% | +7.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.81% | -66.46% | +18.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.45% | -12.20% | -21.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.57% | -38.79% | -9.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 6.95% | -2.76% |
Volatility
ASHS vs. KSTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) is 7.40%, while KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) has a volatility of 15.14%. This indicates that ASHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASHS | KSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.40% | 15.14% | -7.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.00% | 26.19% | -9.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.59% | 35.46% | -12.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.46% | 38.31% | -11.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.58% | 37.69% | -12.11% |
ASHS vs. KSTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than KSTR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASHS vs. KSTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASHS nor KSTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.65% | 1.90% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.34% |
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASHS and KSTR have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KSTR has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to ASHS (7.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASHS dropped -69.90% vs KSTR's -66.46%.
On 5-year performance, ASHS leads with 4.14% vs -0.07% for KSTR. On fees, ASHS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ASHS has been the lower-risk option at 7.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ASHS has performed better with a 4.14% return vs -0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ASHS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for KSTR.
ASHS and KSTR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ASHS tracks CSI 500 Index, while KSTR tracks SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASHS and 0.89% for KSTR.
ASHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASHS and KSTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer