PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASHS vs. KSTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASHS vs. KSTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASHS achieves a 15.30% return, which is significantly lower than KSTR's 31.11% return.


ASHS

1D
0.78%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
15.30%
6M
23.86%
1Y
59.58%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
3.28%

KSTR

1D
2.65%
1M
4.77%
YTD
31.11%
6M
35.86%
1Y
82.70%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
-0.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASHS vs. KSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ASHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF
15.30%39.48%2.68%-10.03%-24.78%14.34%
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
31.11%42.82%6.12%-17.93%-38.51%-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ASHS and KSTR is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021

0.78

The correlation between ASHS and KSTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

ASHS vs. KSTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASHS
KSTR

Technology

29.8%
78.5%

Industrials

19.7%
6.5%

Basic Materials

19.4%
0.6%

Healthcare

7.2%
4.1%

Financial Services

6.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
1.4%

Energy

3.2%
0.9%

Communication Services

3.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.6%

-

Utilities

2.2%

-

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Technology

ASHS
29.8%
KSTR
78.5%

Industrials

ASHS
19.7%
KSTR
6.5%

Basic Materials

ASHS
19.4%
KSTR
0.6%

Healthcare

ASHS
7.2%
KSTR
4.1%

Financial Services

ASHS
6.3%
KSTR

-

Consumer Cyclical

ASHS
5.8%
KSTR
1.4%

Energy

ASHS
3.2%
KSTR
0.9%

Communication Services

ASHS
3.2%
KSTR

-

Consumer Defensive

ASHS
2.6%
KSTR

-

Utilities

ASHS
2.2%
KSTR

-

Real Estate

ASHS
0.7%
KSTR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASHS vs. KSTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASHS
ASHS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ASHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

KSTR
KSTR Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
KSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
KSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASHS vs. KSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASHSKSTRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.65

2.34

+0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.35

2.99

+0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

4.71

-0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.22

12.00

+2.22

ASHS vs. KSTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASHS Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the KSTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASHS and KSTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASHSKSTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

2.34

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

-0.00

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

-0.01

+0.20

Drawdowns

ASHS vs. KSTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASHS drawdown since its inception was -69.90%, which is greater than KSTR's maximum drawdown of -66.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHS and KSTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASHSKSTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.90%

-66.46%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.03%

-17.70%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.13%

-41.55%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.81%

-66.46%

+18.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.45%

-12.20%

-21.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.57%

-38.79%

-9.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

6.95%

-2.76%

Volatility

ASHS vs. KSTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) is 7.40%, while KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) has a volatility of 15.14%. This indicates that ASHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASHSKSTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.40%

15.14%

-7.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.00%

26.19%

-9.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.59%

35.46%

-12.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.46%

38.31%

-11.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.58%

37.69%

-12.11%

ASHS vs. KSTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASHS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than KSTR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASHS vs. KSTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASHS nor KSTR has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.69%0.65%1.90%0.76%0.43%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.34%
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASHS and KSTR have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KSTR has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to ASHS (7.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASHS dropped -69.90% vs KSTR's -66.46%.

On 5-year performance, ASHS leads with 4.14% vs -0.07% for KSTR. On fees, ASHS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ASHS has been the lower-risk option at 7.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ASHS has performed better with a 4.14% return vs -0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ASHS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for KSTR.

ASHS and KSTR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

ASHS tracks CSI 500 Index, while KSTR tracks SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASHS and 0.89% for KSTR.

ASHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASHS and KSTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer