KSTR vs. CQQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ).
KSTR and CQQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KSTR is a passively managed fund by KraneShares that tracks the performance of the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2021. CQQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the AlphaShares China Technology Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2009. Both KSTR and CQQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
KSTR vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KSTR vs. CQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF | -1.77% | 42.82% | 6.12% | -17.93% | -38.51% | -1.70% |
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | -11.50% | 34.96% | 9.84% | -16.71% | -30.09% | -34.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KSTR achieves a -1.77% return, which is significantly higher than CQQQ's -11.50% return.
KSTR
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -13.81%
- YTD
- -1.77%
- 6M
- -9.10%
- 1Y
- 31.42%
- 3Y*
- 2.49%
- 5Y*
- -3.10%
- 10Y*
- —
CQQQ
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -11.62%
- YTD
- -11.50%
- 6M
- -20.29%
- 1Y
- 6.15%
- 3Y*
- 0.59%
- 5Y*
- -10.73%
- 10Y*
- 3.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KSTR vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
KSTR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KSTR vs. CQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
KSTR
CQQQ
KSTR vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KSTR | CQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 0.19 | +0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 0.51 | +0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.06 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 0.23 | +1.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.72 | 0.63 | +4.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KSTR | CQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 0.19 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | -0.29 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.15 | 0.16 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between KSTR and CQQQ is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
KSTR vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison
KSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | 2.45% | 2.17% | 0.28% | 0.55% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.01% | 0.43% | 1.41% | 1.69% | 1.77% |
Drawdowns
KSTR vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KSTR drawdown since its inception was -66.46%, smaller than the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSTR and CQQQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KSTR | CQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.46% | -73.99% | +7.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -24.41% | +6.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.46% | -67.04% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.22% | -56.10% | +21.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.46% | -28.04% | -11.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 8.99% | -2.37% |
Volatility
KSTR vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) has a higher volatility of 11.77% compared to Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) at 10.60%. This indicates that KSTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KSTR | CQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.77% | 10.60% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.37% | 20.75% | +1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.49% | 31.95% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.45% | 37.72% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.24% | 33.06% | +4.18% |