PortfoliosLab logo
KSTR vs. CNXT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between KSTR and CNXT is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

KSTR vs. CNXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KSTR:

0.44

CNXT:

0.23

Sortino Ratio

KSTR:

1.20

CNXT:

0.79

Omega Ratio

KSTR:

1.19

CNXT:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

KSTR:

0.43

CNXT:

0.20

Martin Ratio

KSTR:

1.05

CNXT:

0.45

Ulcer Index

KSTR:

27.20%

CNXT:

30.05%

Daily Std Dev

KSTR:

60.99%

CNXT:

54.71%

Max Drawdown

KSTR:

-66.46%

CNXT:

-68.98%

Current Drawdown

KSTR:

-52.14%

CNXT:

-56.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KSTR achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly higher than CNXT's -4.77% return.


KSTR

YTD

2.08%

1M

-2.49%

6M

-2.85%

1Y

26.42%

3Y*

-7.67%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CNXT

YTD

-4.77%

1M

2.73%

6M

-11.07%

1Y

12.45%

3Y*

-7.54%

5Y*

-1.35%

10Y*

-7.92%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KSTR vs. CNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KSTR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than CNXT's 0.65% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KSTR vs. CNXT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSTR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KSTR is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KSTR is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KSTR is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KSTR is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KSTR is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KSTR is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CNXT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNXT is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNXT is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNXT is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNXT is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNXT is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNXT is 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KSTR vs. CNXT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current KSTR Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the CNXT Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KSTR and CNXT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

KSTR vs. CNXT - Dividend Comparison

KSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CNXT
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF
0.15%0.15%0.00%0.00%9.23%0.01%0.45%0.00%0.19%

Drawdowns

KSTR vs. CNXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSTR drawdown since its inception was -66.46%, roughly equal to the maximum CNXT drawdown of -68.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSTR and CNXT.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

KSTR vs. CNXT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) is 4.90%, while VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a volatility of 7.53%. This indicates that KSTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...