ASHS vs. ASHX
ASHS (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF) and ASHX (Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF) are both China Equities funds from Deutsche Bank - ASHS tracks the CSI 500 Index while ASHX tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASHS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ASHX.
Performance
ASHS vs. ASHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASHS
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 15.10%
- 6M
- 23.90%
- 1Y
- 57.65%
- 3Y*
- 13.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.97%
- 10Y*
- 3.27%
ASHX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASHS vs. ASHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 15.10% | 39.48% | 2.68% | -10.03% | -24.78% | 17.66% | 28.22% | 24.53% | -35.91% | 7.90% |
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% | -13.59% | -26.45% | 2.64% | 42.24% | 35.03% | -27.51% | 20.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASHS and ASHX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2015 | 0.63 |
The correlation between ASHS and ASHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ASHS vs. ASHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ASHS
ASHX
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
ASHS
ASHX
Industrials
ASHS
ASHX
Basic Materials
ASHS
ASHX
Healthcare
ASHS
ASHX
Financial Services
ASHS
ASHX
Consumer Cyclical
ASHS
ASHX
Energy
ASHS
ASHX
Communication Services
ASHS
ASHX
Consumer Defensive
ASHS
ASHX
Utilities
ASHS
ASHX
Real Estate
ASHS
ASHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASHS vs. ASHX — Risk / Return Rank
ASHS
ASHX
ASHS vs. ASHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASHS | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.72 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASHS | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ASHS vs. ASHX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASHS | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.57% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.57% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | — | — |
Volatility
ASHS vs. ASHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASHS | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.59% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.46% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.57% | — | — |
ASHS vs. ASHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASHS vs. ASHX - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASHS nor ASHX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.65% | 1.90% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.34% |
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.80% | 1.78% | 1.07% | 2.48% | 19.46% | 2.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASHS and ASHX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASHX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASHX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHS.
ASHS and ASHX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ASHS tracks CSI 500 Index, while ASHX tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASHS and 0.60% for ASHX.
Find the right allocation for ASHS and ASHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer