PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASHS vs. ASHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASHS vs. ASHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ASHS

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
15.10%
6M
23.90%
1Y
57.65%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*
3.27%

ASHX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASHS vs. ASHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF
15.10%39.48%2.68%-10.03%-24.78%17.66%28.22%24.53%-35.91%7.90%
ASHX
Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.27%-13.59%-26.45%2.64%42.24%35.03%-27.51%20.14%

Correlation

The correlation between ASHS and ASHX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2015

0.63

The correlation between ASHS and ASHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ASHS vs. ASHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASHS
ASHX

Technology

29.8%
14.1%

Industrials

19.7%
16.0%

Basic Materials

19.4%
9.6%

Healthcare

7.2%
7.9%

Financial Services

6.3%
19.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
7.1%

Energy

3.2%
4.2%

Communication Services

3.2%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
14.3%

Utilities

2.2%
4.3%

Real Estate

0.7%
1.4%

Technology

ASHS
29.8%
ASHX
14.1%

Industrials

ASHS
19.7%
ASHX
16.0%

Basic Materials

ASHS
19.4%
ASHX
9.6%

Healthcare

ASHS
7.2%
ASHX
7.9%

Financial Services

ASHS
6.3%
ASHX
19.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ASHS
5.8%
ASHX
7.1%

Energy

ASHS
3.2%
ASHX
4.2%

Communication Services

ASHS
3.2%
ASHX
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

ASHS
2.6%
ASHX
14.3%

Utilities

ASHS
2.2%
ASHX
4.3%

Real Estate

ASHS
0.7%
ASHX
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASHS vs. ASHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASHS
ASHS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ASHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

ASHX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASHS vs. ASHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASHSASHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.72

ASHS vs. ASHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASHSASHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

Drawdowns

ASHS vs. ASHX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASHSASHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

Volatility

ASHS vs. ASHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASHSASHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.57%

ASHS vs. ASHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASHS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASHS vs. ASHX - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASHS nor ASHX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.69%0.65%1.90%0.76%0.43%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.34%
ASHX
Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.38%1.76%0.84%0.80%1.78%1.07%2.48%19.46%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASHS and ASHX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASHX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASHX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHS.

ASHS and ASHX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

ASHS tracks CSI 500 Index, while ASHX tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASHS and 0.60% for ASHX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASHS and ASHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer