ASHS vs. AFTY
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY).
ASHS and AFTY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASHS is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the CSI 500 Index. It was launched on May 21, 2014. AFTY is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the FTSE China A 50. It was launched on Mar 12, 2015. Both ASHS and AFTY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ASHS vs. AFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ASHS vs. AFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 4.66% | 39.48% | 2.68% | -10.03% | -24.78% | 17.66% | 28.22% | 24.53% | -35.91% | 7.90% |
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.48% | -12.80% | -22.47% | -7.37% | 33.77% | 44.23% | -24.26% | 45.15% |
Returns By Period
ASHS
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -11.46%
- YTD
- 4.66%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 40.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.07%
AFTY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASHS vs. AFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than AFTY's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ASHS vs. AFTY — Risk / Return Rank
ASHS
AFTY
ASHS vs. AFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASHS | AFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.16 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.16 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASHS | AFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between ASHS and AFTY is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ASHS vs. AFTY - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASHS nor AFTY has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.65% | 1.90% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.34% |
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.23% | 2.08% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 7.96% | 1.85% | 6.62% | 1.19% | 16.76% |
Drawdowns
ASHS vs. AFTY - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASHS | AFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.59% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.78% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | — | — |
Volatility
ASHS vs. AFTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ASHS | AFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.04% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.08% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.64% | — | — |