PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ASHR vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ASHR vs. YCS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - ASHR is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI 300 Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ASHR returned 5.39%/yr vs 12.32%/yr for YCS. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASHR charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

ASHR vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASHR achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 6.99% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHR has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 5.39%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.32% annualized return.

ASHR

1D
2.09%
1M
2.32%
YTD
10.26%
6M
13.75%
1Y
40.21%
3Y*
12.12%
5Y*
-0.98%
10Y*
5.39%

YCS

1D
0.03%
1M
4.27%
YTD
6.99%
6M
8.81%
1Y
35.19%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
23.16%
10Y*
12.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASHR vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund		10.26%27.02%11.95%-12.52%-27.52%-1.57%36.29%36.50%-28.45%33.47%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen		6.99%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ASHR and YCS is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2013

0.02

The correlation between ASHR and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund

ProShares UltraShort Yen

Often compared with ASHR:
ASHR vs. MCHIASHR vs. FXIASHR vs. CNYAASHR vs. ASHSASHR vs. SPYASHR vs. GXCASHR vs. CHAU
Often compared with YCS:
YCS vs. YCLYCS vs. JPYUSD=XYCS vs. PFIXYCS vs. TBTYCS vs. UUPYCS vs. BCSFYCS vs. SPY

Return for Risk

ASHR vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ASHR
ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASHR vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ASHRYCSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

2.05

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.31

2.59

+0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.37

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.30

3.95

+1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.41

12.35

+4.07

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASHR vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASHR Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASHR and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ASHRYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.05

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

1.10

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.65

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.33

-0.10

Drawdowns

ASHR vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASHR drawdown since its inception was -51.30%, roughly equal to the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHR and YCS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ASHRYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.30%

-49.56%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.69%

-8.30%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.12%

-23.05%

-10.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.76%

-27.32%

-18.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.30%

-27.32%

-23.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.52%

-0.04%

-15.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.19%

-19.94%

-9.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.66%

-0.18%

Volatility

ASHR vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that ASHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ASHRYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.94%

2.75%

+3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.55%

12.36%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.84%

17.38%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.90%

21.11%

+2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.06%

19.02%

+5.04%

ASHR vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASHR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASHR vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund		2.09%2.31%1.13%2.48%1.13%0.88%0.81%0.98%1.32%0.84%0.73%30.13%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

ASHR and YCS have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASHR has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASHR dropped -51.30% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 12.32% vs 5.39% for ASHR. On fees, ASHR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 12.32% return vs 5.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ASHR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

ASHR has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

ASHR is categorized as China Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. ASHR tracks CSI 300 Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: DWS and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASHR and 1.00% for YCS.

ASHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASHR and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer