PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASHR vs. EWW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASHR vs. EWW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASHR achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly lower than EWW's 13.18% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHR has underperformed EWW with an annualized return of 5.65%, while EWW has yielded a comparatively higher 7.89% annualized return.


ASHR

1D
0.83%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
7.49%
6M
9.62%
1Y
35.11%
3Y*
11.43%
5Y*
-1.32%
10Y*
5.65%

EWW

1D
1.46%
1M
1.63%
YTD
13.18%
6M
13.14%
1Y
33.34%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
7.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASHR vs. EWW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
7.49%27.02%11.95%-12.52%-27.52%-1.57%36.29%36.50%-28.45%33.47%
EWW
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
13.18%53.65%-28.22%40.32%1.24%20.27%-3.06%12.64%-14.58%14.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ASHR and EWW is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2013

0.35

ASHR vs. EWW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASHR
EWW

Technology

31.1%

-

Financial Services

19.1%
17.8%

Industrials

16.1%
12.7%

Basic Materials

9.4%
26.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
23.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
1.4%

Healthcare

4.4%
0.5%

Utilities

3.1%

-

Energy

2.5%

-

Communication Services

0.8%
9.8%

Real Estate

0.4%
7.7%

Technology

ASHR
31.1%
EWW

-

Financial Services

ASHR
19.1%
EWW
17.8%

Industrials

ASHR
16.1%
EWW
12.7%

Basic Materials

ASHR
9.4%
EWW
26.2%

Consumer Defensive

ASHR
6.7%
EWW
23.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ASHR
6.4%
EWW
1.4%

Healthcare

ASHR
4.4%
EWW
0.5%

Utilities

ASHR
3.1%
EWW

-

Energy

ASHR
2.5%
EWW

-

Communication Services

ASHR
0.8%
EWW
9.8%

Real Estate

ASHR
0.4%
EWW
7.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASHR vs. EWW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASHR
ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

EWW
EWW Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
EWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWW Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWW Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASHR vs. EWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASHREWWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.27

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

2.32

+2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.89

8.25

+4.64

ASHR vs. EWW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASHR Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the EWW Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASHR and EWW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASHR vs. EWW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASHR drawdown since its inception was -51.30%, smaller than the maximum EWW drawdown of -64.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHR and EWW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASHREWWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.30%

-64.94%

+13.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.69%

-13.98%

+6.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.12%

-31.17%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.59%

-31.17%

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.30%

-53.62%

+2.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.64%

-3.40%

-14.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.15%

-18.51%

-10.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

3.93%

-1.30%

Volatility

ASHR vs. EWW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) is 6.04%, while iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that ASHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASHREWWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

6.96%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.08%

18.46%

-6.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.24%

21.76%

-4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.92%

22.58%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.06%

25.39%

-1.33%

ASHR vs. EWW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASHR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EWW's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASHR vs. EWW - Dividend Comparison

ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than EWW's 3.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
2.15%2.31%1.13%2.48%1.13%0.88%0.81%0.98%1.32%0.84%0.73%30.13%
EWW
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
3.07%3.48%4.39%2.19%3.64%2.06%1.43%2.92%2.30%2.22%1.77%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASHR and EWW have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWW has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to ASHR (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASHR dropped -51.30% vs EWW's -64.94%.

On 10-year performance, EWW leads with 7.89% vs 5.65% for ASHR. On fees, EWW is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, ASHR has been the lower-risk option at 6.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWW has performed better with a 7.89% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWW is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHR.

EWW has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 2.15% for ASHR.

ASHR is categorized as China Equities, while EWW is Latin America Equities. ASHR tracks CSI 300 Index, while EWW tracks MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASHR and 0.49% for EWW.

ASHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASHR and EWW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer