ASHR vs. EWH
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH).
ASHR and EWH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASHR is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the CSI 300 Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2013. EWH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Hong Kong Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. Both ASHR and EWH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ASHR vs. EWH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ASHR vs. EWH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | -0.64% | 27.02% | 11.95% | -12.52% | -27.52% | -1.57% | 36.29% | 36.50% | -28.45% | 33.47% |
EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | 8.66% | 34.50% | 0.00% | -13.87% | -6.81% | -3.49% | 4.17% | 10.74% | -8.76% | 36.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASHR achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than EWH's 8.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHR has underperformed EWH with an annualized return of 4.13%, while EWH has yielded a comparatively higher 5.22% annualized return.
ASHR
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -4.25%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 25.74%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- -2.00%
- 10Y*
- 4.13%
EWH
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- YTD
- 8.66%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 39.05%
- 3Y*
- 8.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASHR vs. EWH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EWH's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ASHR vs. EWH — Risk / Return Rank
ASHR
EWH
ASHR vs. EWH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASHR | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 2.09 | -0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 2.66 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.38 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 2.66 | -0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.57 | 11.06 | -1.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASHR | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 2.09 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.04 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.27 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.18 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between ASHR and EWH is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ASHR vs. EWH - Dividend Comparison
ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than EWH's 4.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 2.32% | 2.31% | 1.13% | 2.48% | 1.13% | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 0.84% | 0.73% | 30.13% |
EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | 4.78% | 5.20% | 4.17% | 4.28% | 2.91% | 2.78% | 2.56% | 2.71% | 2.93% | 4.35% | 3.08% | 2.63% |
Drawdowns
ASHR vs. EWH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASHR drawdown since its inception was -51.30%, smaller than the maximum EWH drawdown of -66.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHR and EWH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASHR | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.30% | -66.44% | +15.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.41% | -14.56% | +3.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.44% | -42.71% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.30% | -42.71% | -8.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.87% | -4.63% | -19.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.34% | -19.58% | -9.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 3.49% | -0.82% |
Volatility
ASHR vs. EWH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) is 5.81%, while iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) has a volatility of 6.30%. This indicates that ASHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ASHR | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 6.30% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 12.53% | -1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.63% | 18.77% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.85% | 19.97% | +3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.13% | 19.55% | +4.58% |