EWH vs. FXI
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI).
EWH and FXI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EWH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Hong Kong Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. FXI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 25 Index. It was launched on Oct 5, 2004. Both EWH and FXI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EWH or FXI.
Performance
EWH vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWH achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than FXI's 28.25% return. Over the past 10 years, EWH has outperformed FXI with an annualized return of 0.78%, while FXI has yielded a comparatively lower -0.22% annualized return.
EWH
1.75%
-4.95%
-1.76%
2.79%
-3.16%
0.78%
FXI
28.25%
-4.51%
6.23%
21.02%
-3.63%
-0.22%
Key characteristics
| EWH | FXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.14 | 0.65 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.36 | 1.17 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.04 | 1.14 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.08 | 0.36 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.35 | 2.07 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.27% | 10.22% |
| Daily Std Dev | 23.66% | 32.40% |
| Max Drawdown | -66.43% | -72.68% |
| Current Drawdown | -30.89% | -39.29% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EWH vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWH has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between EWH and FXI is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EWH vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EWH vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
EWH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than FXI's 2.25% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | 4.51% | 4.28% | 2.91% | 2.78% | 2.56% | 2.70% | 2.94% | 4.35% | 3.07% | 2.62% | 3.52% | 2.96% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.25% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% | 2.51% | 2.64% |
Drawdowns
EWH vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWH drawdown since its inception was -66.43%, smaller than the maximum FXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWH and FXI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EWH vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) is 6.15%, while iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) has a volatility of 10.55%. This indicates that EWH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.