PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASCCY vs. LFVN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ASCCY vs. LFVN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Asics Corp ADR (ASCCY) and LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASCCY achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly lower than LFVN's 49.30% return.


ASCCY

1D
-0.95%
1M
-4.58%
YTD
17.57%
6M
13.17%
1Y
15.77%
3Y*
54.90%
5Y*
36.39%
10Y*

LFVN

1D
-4.64%
1M
72.82%
YTD
49.30%
6M
41.49%
1Y
-27.80%
3Y*
23.99%
5Y*
4.26%
10Y*
-2.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASCCY vs. LFVN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASCCY
Asics Corp ADR
17.57%21.77%152.83%43.48%1.37%10.10%18.67%27.61%-13.67%-0.86%
LFVN
LifeVantage Corporation
49.30%-64.29%197.21%74.03%-39.78%-32.19%-40.29%18.35%177.10%2.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ASCCY and LFVN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2017

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ASCCY:

$19.93B

LFVN:

$114.57M

EPS

ASCCY:

¥161.60

LFVN:

$0.45

PE Ratio

ASCCY:

27.86

LFVN:

20.25

PEG Ratio

ASCCY:

0.33

LFVN:

0.50

PS Ratio

ASCCY:

3.63

LFVN:

0.60

PB Ratio

ASCCY:

10.05

LFVN:

3.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

ASCCY:

¥885.06B

LFVN:

$195.32M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ASCCY:

¥476.81B

LFVN:

$152.62M

EBITDA (TTM)

ASCCY:

¥190.22B

LFVN:

$8.69M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASCCY vs. LFVN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASCCY
ASCCY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ASCCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASCCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASCCY Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ASCCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASCCY Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

LFVN
LFVN Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
LFVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFVN Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
LFVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFVN Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASCCY vs. LFVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Asics Corp ADR (ASCCY) and LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASCCYLFVNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.98

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

-0.39

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.42

-0.57

+1.99

ASCCY vs. LFVN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASCCY Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is higher than the LFVN Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASCCY and LFVN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASCCY vs. LFVN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASCCY drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, smaller than the maximum LFVN drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCCY and LFVN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASCCYLFVNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.92%

-99.57%

+34.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.82%

-71.73%

+50.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.09%

-83.90%

+56.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.44%

-83.90%

+36.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.05%

-90.72%

+78.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.12%

-89.57%

+71.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.17%

48.66%

-37.49%

Volatility

ASCCY vs. LFVN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Asics Corp ADR (ASCCY) is 9.57%, while LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) has a volatility of 38.68%. This indicates that ASCCY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASCCYLFVNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.57%

38.68%

-29.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.02%

60.12%

-31.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.05%

71.93%

-30.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.88%

65.11%

-20.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.06%

61.48%

-14.42%

Dividends

ASCCY vs. LFVN - Dividend Comparison

ASCCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than LFVN's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ASCCY
Asics Corp ADR
0.29%0.34%0.69%0.00%0.00%
LFVN
LifeVantage Corporation
2.04%2.84%0.88%8.33%2.42%

Financials

ASCCY vs. LFVN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Asics Corp ADR and LifeVantage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B20222023202420252026
275.23B
43.72M
(ASCCY) Total Revenue
(LFVN) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ASCCY values in JPY, LFVN values in USD

ASCCY vs. LFVN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Asics Corp ADR and LifeVantage Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
51.8%
79.0%
Portfolio components
ASCCY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Asics Corp ADR reported a gross profit of 142.55B and revenue of 275.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.

LFVN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a gross profit of 34.54M and revenue of 43.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

ASCCY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Asics Corp ADR reported an operating income of 61.88B and revenue of 275.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

LFVN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported an operating income of 1.68M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.

ASCCY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Asics Corp ADR reported a net income of 47.43B and revenue of 275.23B, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.

LFVN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a net income of 1.36M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ASCCY and LFVN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFVN has higher volatility (38.68%) compared to ASCCY (9.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASCCY dropped -64.92% vs LFVN's -99.57%.

ASCCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASCCY and LFVN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer