AS vs. ATMP
AS (Amer Sports, Inc) is a stock, while ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) is MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. Over the past year, AS returned -2.74% vs 23.85% for ATMP. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AS vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AS achieves a -4.93% return, which is significantly lower than ATMP's 26.22% return.
AS
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- 6M
- -3.06%
- YTD
- -4.93%
- 1Y
- -2.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 47.81%
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- 6M
- 17.51%
- YTD
- 26.22%
- 1Y
- 23.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- 5.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $145.99M | $126.51M | $148.20M | |
| $521.25K | $462.49K | $511.48K |
AS vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AS Amer Sports, Inc | -4.93% | 33.58% | 108.66% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 26.22% | 1.73% | 30.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between AS and ATMP is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024 | 0.15 |
The correlation between AS and ATMP shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AS vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank
AS
ATMP
AS vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amer Sports, Inc (AS) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AS | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.27 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 2.81 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 6.57 | -6.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AS vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AS drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AS and ATMP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AS | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -80.86% | +40.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.78% | -8.30% | -20.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.37% | -1.27% | -14.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.48% | -30.81% | +17.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.74% | 3.54% | +12.20% |
Volatility
AS vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison
Amer Sports, Inc (AS) has a higher volatility of 10.37% compared to Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) at 5.01%. This indicates that AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AS | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.37% | 5.01% | +5.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.37% | 11.75% | +18.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.02% | 14.57% | +27.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.93% | 21.94% | +26.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.93% | 27.62% | +21.31% |
Dividends
AS vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison
Neither AS nor ATMP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AS and ATMP have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AS has higher volatility (10.37%) compared to ATMP (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AS dropped -40.71% vs ATMP's -80.86%.
ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AS and ATMP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer