ARMH vs. SOXQ
ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARMH is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. ARMH is actively managed, while SOXQ is passively managed. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.
Performance
ARMH vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMH
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -24.02%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -9.38%
- 6M
- 40.74%
- YTD
- 61.64%
- 1Y
- 107.64%
- 3Y*
- 46.52%
- 5Y*
- 28.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 29.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $185.31K | $454.05K | $691.73K | |
| $211.18M | $220.46M | $283.01M |
ARMH vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | -22.64% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | -9.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMH and SOXQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMH vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SOXQ
ARMH vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMH | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.79 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.50 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMH vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -48.81%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMH | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.81% | -46.01% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.83% | -21.83% | -24.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.50% | -12.92% | -10.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.97% | — |
Volatility
ARMH vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMH | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.98% | 43.45% | +54.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.98% | 38.30% | +59.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.98% | 37.92% | +60.06% |
ARMH vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ARMH and SOXQ have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ARMH vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMH and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH and SOXQ have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.
SOXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
ARMH is categorized as Technology Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Invesco.
Find the right allocation for ARMH and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer