ARMH vs. TIME
ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and TIME (Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for TIME.
Performance
ARMH vs. TIME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMH
- 1D
- -6.83%
- 1M
- -20.34%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TIME
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 6.84%
- 1Y
- 14.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMH vs. TIME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | -3.02% |
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF | -2.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMH and TIME is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMH vs. TIME — Risk / Return Rank
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TIME
ARMH vs. TIME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF (TIME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMH | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMH vs. TIME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -32.10%, which is greater than TIME's maximum drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and TIME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMH | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.10% | -24.26% | -7.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.10% | -3.43% | -28.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.18% | -5.48% | -9.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.72% | — |
Volatility
ARMH vs. TIME - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMH | TIME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.58% | 13.93% | +91.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.58% | 17.61% | +87.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.58% | 17.61% | +87.97% |
ARMH vs. TIME - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than TIME's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMH vs. TIME - Dividend Comparison
ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TIME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIME Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF | 9.38% | 10.02% | 15.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMH and TIME have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.
TIME has the higher dividend yield at 9.38%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Clockwise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 1.00% for TIME.
Find the right allocation for ARMH and TIME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer