PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ARMH vs. CLOU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ARMH vs. CLOU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and CLOU (Global X Cloud Computing ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ARMH is actively managed, while CLOU is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for CLOU.

Performance

ARMH vs. CLOU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

ARMH

1D
2.87%
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

CLOU

1D
-3.71%
1M
14.89%
YTD
9.15%
6M
6.98%
1Y
6.33%
3Y*
9.18%
5Y*
-0.66%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMH vs. CLOU - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)
ARMH
Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF		23.00%
CLOU
Global X Cloud Computing ETF		7.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ARMH and CLOU is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF

Global X Cloud Computing ETF

Often compared with ARMH:
ARMH vs. SOXXARMH vs. VGTARMH vs. MAGSARMH vs. AISARMH vs. XLKIARMH vs. XLKARMH vs. BOTZ
Often compared with CLOU:
CLOU vs. WCLDCLOU vs. SKYYCLOU vs. QQQCLOU vs. FCLDCLOU vs. CLDLCLOU vs. SKYUCLOU vs. TECB

Return for Risk

ARMH vs. CLOU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ARMH
CLOU
CLOU Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CLOU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOU Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOU Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMH vs. CLOU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ARMH vs. CLOU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ARMHCLOUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

0.22

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

-0.02

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

471,500.14

0.24

+471,499.90

Drawdowns

ARMH vs. CLOU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -1.61%, smaller than the maximum CLOU drawdown of -53.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and CLOU.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ARMHCLOUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-53.74%

+52.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-27.24%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-33.18%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-53.74%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-21.83%

+21.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-24.42%

+24.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

11.02%

—

Volatility

ARMH vs. CLOU - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ARMHCLOUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

13.85%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

24.82%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.00%

29.50%

+83.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.00%

30.57%

+82.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

113.00%

30.79%

+82.21%

ARMH vs. CLOU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOU's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARMH vs. CLOU - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARMH nor CLOU has paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ARMH
Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CLOU
Global X Cloud Computing ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.76%0.00%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

ARMH and CLOU have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CLOU.

ARMH and CLOU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.68% for CLOU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARMH and CLOU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer