ARMH vs. CLOU
ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and CLOU (Global X Cloud Computing ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ARMH is actively managed, while CLOU is passively managed. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for CLOU.
Performance
ARMH vs. CLOU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMH
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -24.02%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CLOU
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 25.04%
- YTD
- 14.15%
- 1Y
- 17.79%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- -2.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $185.31K | $454.05K | $691.73K | |
| $7.09M | $7.15M | $6.69M |
ARMH vs. CLOU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | -22.64% |
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 15.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMH and CLOU is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMH vs. CLOU — Risk / Return Rank
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CLOU
ARMH vs. CLOU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMH | CLOU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMH vs. CLOU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -48.81%, smaller than the maximum CLOU drawdown of -53.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and CLOU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMH | CLOU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.81% | -53.74% | +4.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -53.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.83% | -18.25% | -27.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.50% | -24.44% | +0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.85% | — |
Volatility
ARMH vs. CLOU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMH | CLOU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.98% | 30.87% | +67.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.98% | 30.90% | +67.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.98% | 30.75% | +67.23% |
ARMH vs. CLOU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOU's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMH vs. CLOU - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARMH nor CLOU has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMH and CLOU have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CLOU.
ARMH and CLOU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.68% for CLOU.
Find the right allocation for ARMH and CLOU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer