ARKQ vs. HUMN

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) and HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) are both Robotics funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ARKQ returned 16.72% vs 19.31% for HUMN. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

ARKQ vs. HUMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than HUMN's 0.87% return.

ARKQ

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: -11.64%
• 6M: -13.36%
• YTD: 1.29%
• 1Y: 16.72%
• 3Y*: 25.14%
• 5Y*: 8.18%
• 10Y*: 19.84%

HUMN

• 1D: -3.28%
• 1M: -15.23%
• 6M: -5.67%
• YTD: 0.87%
• 1Y: 19.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKQ vs. HUMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF	1.29%	34.21%
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.87%	20.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKQ and HUMN is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.73

The correlation between ARKQ and HUMN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

ARKQ vs. HUMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ARKQ	HUMN
Industrials	40.4%	38.4%
Technology	32.1%	26.6%
Consumer Cyclical	14.6%	17.4%
Communication Services	8.9%	2.1%
Energy	1.5%	-
Healthcare	1.1%	-
Utilities	1.0%	-
Financial Services	0.9%	3.6%
Basic Materials	-	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

ARKQ vs. HUMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKQ

ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 20
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 19
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 23

HUMN

HUMN Risk / Return Rank: 22
HUMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
HUMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
HUMN Omega Ratio Rank: 21
HUMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
HUMN Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKQ vs. HUMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARKQ	HUMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	0.57	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.90	1.00	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.12	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.82	0.86	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.11	2.50	-0.39

ARKQ vs. HUMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is comparable to the HUMN Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKQ and HUMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARKQ vs. HUMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, which is greater than HUMN's maximum drawdown of -22.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and HUMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARKQ	HUMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.89%	-22.61%	-37.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.58%	-22.61%	+2.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.25%	-22.61%	+3.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.18%	-5.33%	-11.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.94%	7.74%	+0.20%

Volatility

ARKQ vs. HUMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) is 9.38%, while Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) has a volatility of 15.86%. This indicates that ARKQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARKQ	HUMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.38%	15.86%	-6.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.40%	28.96%	-2.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.46%	34.09%	+0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.76%	33.38%	-0.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.06%	33.38%	-3.32%

ARKQ vs. HUMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ARKQ and HUMN have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

ARKQ vs. HUMN - Dividend Comparison

ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than HUMN's 0.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF	0.26%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.80%	0.86%	0.00%	2.86%	1.54%	0.00%	0.98%
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF	0.72%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARKQ and HUMN in my portfolio?

ARKQ and HUMN have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARKQ or HUMN?

HUMN has higher volatility (15.86%) compared to ARKQ (9.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKQ dropped -59.89% vs HUMN's -22.61%.

Which ETF is better, ARKQ or HUMN?

On 1-year performance, HUMN leads with 19.31% vs 16.72% for ARKQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, ARKQ has been the lower-risk option at 9.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARKQ or HUMN?

Over the 1-year period, HUMN has performed better with a 19.31% return vs 16.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARKQ or HUMN?

ARKQ and HUMN have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARKQ or HUMN?

HUMN has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.26% for ARKQ.

What is the main difference between ARKQ and HUMN?

They also come from different issuers: ARK and Roundhill.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HUMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.