PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKQ vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKQ vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 29.28% return.


ARKQ

1D
0.96%
1M
-10.06%
6M
-7.14%
YTD
0.36%
1Y
21.95%
3Y*
25.50%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
19.53%
ALL TIME*
16.64%

QTUM

1D
0.67%
1M
-8.88%
6M
22.33%
YTD
29.28%
1Y
57.72%
3Y*
39.51%
5Y*
24.56%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.90M$14.85M$24.73M
$54.21M$61.13M$111.15M

ARKQ vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
0.36%48.81%33.88%40.70%-46.75%1.74%107.20%25.94%-17.11%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
29.28%36.65%50.54%39.86%-28.80%35.18%42.05%47.99%-19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKQ and QTUM is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018

0.84

The correlation between ARKQ and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

ARKQ vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARKQ
QTUM

Industrials

39.4%
8.9%

Technology

32.0%
81.4%

Consumer Cyclical

17.2%
2.0%

Communication Services

7.5%
6.6%

Healthcare

1.6%
1.2%

Energy

1.6%

-

Financial Services

0.9%
0.0%

Utilities

0.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

ARKQ
39.4%
QTUM
8.9%

Technology

ARKQ
32.0%
QTUM
81.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ARKQ
17.2%
QTUM
2.0%

Communication Services

ARKQ
7.5%
QTUM
6.6%

Healthcare

ARKQ
1.6%
QTUM
1.2%

Energy

ARKQ
1.6%
QTUM

-

Financial Services

ARKQ
0.9%
QTUM
0.0%

Utilities

ARKQ
0.9%
QTUM

-

Basic Materials

ARKQ

-

QTUM

-

Consumer Defensive

ARKQ

-

QTUM

-

Real Estate

ARKQ

-

QTUM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKQ vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARKQ
ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARKQ vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARKQQTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.29

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

2.57

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.13

9.41

-7.28

ARKQ vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKQ and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARKQ vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and QTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKQQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.89%

-38.45%

-21.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.82%

-21.51%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.76%

-25.39%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.71%

-38.45%

-17.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.99%

-16.16%

-3.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.19%

-8.27%

-8.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.86%

5.87%

+2.99%

Volatility

ARKQ vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) is 9.78%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 11.38%. This indicates that ARKQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKQQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.78%

11.38%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.83%

26.47%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.68%

31.67%

+3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.85%

27.69%

+5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.13%

27.69%

+2.44%

ARKQ vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKQ vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than QTUM's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
0.27%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.80%0.86%0.00%2.86%1.54%0.00%0.98%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.83%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARKQ and QTUM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTUM has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to ARKQ (9.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKQ dropped -59.89% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 24.56% vs 7.45% for ARKQ. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, ARKQ has been the lower-risk option at 9.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 24.56% return vs 7.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.27% for ARKQ.

ARKQ is categorized as Robotics, while QTUM is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKQ and 0.40% for QTUM.

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKQ and QTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer