ARHS vs. ROAD
ARHS (Arhaus, Inc.) and ROAD (Construction Partners, Inc.) are both stocks. ARHS operates in Home Improvement Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while ROAD operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, ARHS returned -10.71%/yr vs 46.78%/yr for ROAD. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ARHS vs. ROAD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARHS achieves a -26.05% return, which is significantly lower than ROAD's -0.40% return.
ARHS
- 1D
- 6.61%
- 1M
- -8.35%
- 6M
- -21.87%
- YTD
- -26.05%
- 1Y
- -4.50%
- 3Y*
- -10.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -7.63%
ROAD
- 1D
- 4.62%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 13.86%
- 3Y*
- 46.78%
- 5Y*
- 27.18%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 29.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
ARHS Arhaus, Inc. | $8.96M | $8.02M | $9.64M |
| $158.25M | $131.39M | $97.84M |
ARHS vs. ROAD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARHS Arhaus, Inc. | -26.05% | 19.26% | -17.91% | 21.54% | -26.42% | 6.00% |
ROAD Construction Partners, Inc. | -0.40% | 22.71% | 103.26% | 63.06% | -9.25% | -23.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARHS and ROAD is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
ARHS:
$1.12B
ROAD:
$6.11B
ARHS:
$0.46
ROAD:
$2.27
ARHS:
17.32
ROAD:
47.71
ARHS:
0.33
ROAD:
0.88
ARHS:
0.81
ROAD:
1.86
ARHS:
3.00
ROAD:
6.21
ARHS:
$1.38B
ROAD:
$3.26B
ARHS:
$534.72M
ROAD:
$511.53M
ARHS:
$157.49M
ROAD:
$397.81M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARHS vs. ROAD — Risk / Return Rank
ARHS
ROAD
ARHS vs. ROAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARHS | ROAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.09 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 0.42 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | 0.85 | -0.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARHS vs. ROAD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARHS drawdown since its inception was -69.34%, which is greater than ROAD's maximum drawdown of -54.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARHS and ROAD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARHS | ROAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.34% | -54.54% | -14.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.86% | -33.44% | -19.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.34% | -33.62% | -35.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -54.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.88% | -23.04% | -34.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.43% | -16.44% | -22.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.58% | 16.41% | +14.17% |
Volatility
ARHS vs. ROAD - Volatility Comparison
Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) has a higher volatility of 16.83% compared to Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) at 13.53%. This indicates that ARHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARHS | ROAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.83% | 13.53% | +3.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.50% | 39.84% | +2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.73% | 49.05% | +7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.67% | 45.81% | +16.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.67% | 48.80% | +13.87% |
Dividends
ARHS vs. ROAD - Dividend Comparison
ARHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, while ROAD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ARHS Arhaus, Inc. | 4.43% | 0.00% | 5.32% |
ROAD Construction Partners, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ARHS vs. ROAD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arhaus, Inc. and Construction Partners, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ARHS vs. ROAD - Profitability Comparison
ARHS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Arhaus, Inc. reported a gross profit of 114.44M and revenue of 314.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.4%.
ROAD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 98.85M and revenue of 769.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.
ARHS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Arhaus, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.14M and revenue of 314.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.
ROAD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 37.38M and revenue of 769.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
ARHS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Arhaus, Inc. reported a net income of 2.22M and revenue of 314.28M, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.
ROAD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 9.18M and revenue of 769.20M, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARHS and ROAD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARHS has higher volatility (16.83%) compared to ROAD (13.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARHS dropped -69.34% vs ROAD's -54.54%.
ROAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARHS and ROAD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer