ARHS vs. DRI

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

ARHS (Arhaus, Inc.) and DRI (Darden Restaurants, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — ARHS in Home Improvement Retail, DRI in Restaurants. Over the past 3 years, ARHS returned -7.75%/yr vs 8.83%/yr for DRI. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ARHS vs. DRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) and Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARHS achieves a -26.71% return, which is significantly lower than DRI's 8.86% return.

ARHS

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: 9.21%
• 6M: -25.04%
• YTD: -26.71%
• 1Y: -6.53%
• 3Y*: -7.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRI

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -6.69%
• 6M: -3.73%
• YTD: 8.86%
• 1Y: -3.60%
• 3Y*: 8.83%
• 5Y*: 9.76%
• 10Y*: 15.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARHS vs. DRI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ARHS Arhaus, Inc.	-26.71%	19.26%	-17.91%	21.54%	-26.42%	6.00%
DRI Darden Restaurants, Inc.	8.86%	1.56%	17.70%	22.83%	-4.84%	3.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ARHS and DRI is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021	0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap ARHS : $1.11B DRI : $22.42B
EPS ARHS : $0.46 DRI : $10.35
PE Ratio ARHS : 17.17 DRI : 18.91
PEG Ratio ARHS : 0.33 DRI : 2.12
PS Ratio ARHS : 0.80 DRI : 1.73
PB Ratio ARHS : 2.98 DRI : 10.21
Total Revenue (TTM) ARHS : $1.38B DRI : $13.21B
Gross Profit (TTM) ARHS : $534.72M DRI : $9.17B
EBITDA (TTM) ARHS : $157.49M DRI : $2.34B

Return for Risk

ARHS vs. DRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARHS

ARHS Risk / Return Rank: 41
ARHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
ARHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
ARHS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
ARHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
ARHS Martin Ratio Rank: 42

DRI

DRI Risk / Return Rank: 37
DRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
DRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
DRI Omega Ratio Rank: 34
DRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
DRI Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARHS vs. DRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) and Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARHS	DRI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	-0.14	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.24	-0.02	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.00	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.12	-0.18	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.22	-0.39	+0.17

ARHS vs. DRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARHS Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is comparable to the DRI Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARHS and DRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARHS vs. DRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARHS drawdown since its inception was -69.34%, roughly equal to the maximum DRI drawdown of -72.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARHS and DRI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARHS	DRI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.34%	-72.80%	+3.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.86%	-20.07%	-32.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.34%	-23.92%	-45.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.38%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.25%	-9.93%	-48.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.19%	-12.98%	-26.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.32%	9.21%	+20.11%

Volatility

ARHS vs. DRI - Volatility Comparison

Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) has a higher volatility of 17.69% compared to Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) at 7.01%. This indicates that ARHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARHS	DRI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.69%	7.01%	+10.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.48%	19.58%	+21.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.85%	25.59%	+31.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.68%	27.23%	+35.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.68%	35.95%	+26.73%

Dividends

ARHS vs. DRI - Dividend Comparison

ARHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than DRI's 3.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARHS Arhaus, Inc.	4.47%	0.00%	5.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DRI Darden Restaurants, Inc.	3.13%	3.15%	2.90%	3.07%	3.34%	2.29%	0.99%	2.99%	2.76%	2.48%	2.92%	13.76%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARHS and DRI in my portfolio?

ARHS and DRI have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARHS or DRI?

ARHS has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to DRI (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARHS dropped -69.34% vs DRI's -72.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.