PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARHS vs. CMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARHS vs. CMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARHS achieves a -33.82% return, which is significantly lower than CMG's -16.35% return.


ARHS

1D
1.73%
1M
11.87%
YTD
-33.82%
6M
-36.76%
1Y
-14.24%
3Y*
-5.99%
5Y*
10Y*

CMG

1D
1.34%
1M
-5.90%
YTD
-16.35%
6M
-18.10%
1Y
-42.45%
3Y*
-8.85%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
14.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARHS vs. CMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ARHS
Arhaus, Inc.
-33.82%19.26%-17.91%21.54%-26.42%6.00%
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
-16.35%-38.64%31.83%64.83%-20.64%-1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between ARHS and CMG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021

0.35

The correlation between ARHS and CMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARHS:

$1.00B

CMG:

$40.29B

EPS

ARHS:

$0.46

CMG:

$1.09

PE Ratio

ARHS:

15.49

CMG:

28.31

PEG Ratio

ARHS:

0.30

CMG:

1.06

PS Ratio

ARHS:

0.72

CMG:

3.39

PB Ratio

ARHS:

2.69

CMG:

16.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARHS:

$1.38B

CMG:

$12.14B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARHS:

$534.72M

CMG:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

ARHS:

$157.49M

CMG:

$2.30B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARHS vs. CMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARHS
ARHS Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ARHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARHS Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ARHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARHS Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

CMG
CMG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
CMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
CMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARHS vs. CMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARHSCMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.80

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

-0.82

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.50

-1.18

+0.67

ARHS vs. CMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARHS Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is higher than the CMG Sharpe Ratio of -1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARHS and CMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARHS vs. CMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARHS drawdown since its inception was -69.34%, smaller than the maximum CMG drawdown of -74.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARHS and CMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARHSCMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.34%

-74.61%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.86%

-51.61%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.34%

-58.89%

-10.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.30%

-54.85%

-7.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-21.41%

-17.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.29%

36.08%

-7.79%

Volatility

ARHS vs. CMG - Volatility Comparison

Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) has a higher volatility of 15.81% compared to Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) at 12.23%. This indicates that ARHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARHSCMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.81%

12.23%

+3.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.96%

24.11%

+15.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.68%

38.80%

+16.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.69%

33.74%

+28.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.69%

35.68%

+27.01%

Dividends

ARHS vs. CMG - Dividend Comparison

ARHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, while CMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
ARHS
Arhaus, Inc.
4.95%0.00%5.32%
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ARHS vs. CMG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arhaus, Inc. and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
314.28M
3.09B
(ARHS) Total Revenue
(CMG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ARHS vs. CMG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arhaus, Inc. and Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
36.4%
68.4%
Portfolio components
ARHS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arhaus, Inc. reported a gross profit of 114.44M and revenue of 314.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.4%.

CMG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.11B and revenue of 3.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.4%.

ARHS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arhaus, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.14M and revenue of 314.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.7%.

CMG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported an operating income of 397.06M and revenue of 3.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

ARHS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arhaus, Inc. reported a net income of 2.22M and revenue of 314.28M, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.

CMG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported a net income of 302.82M and revenue of 3.09B, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ARHS and CMG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARHS has higher volatility (15.81%) compared to CMG (12.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARHS dropped -69.34% vs CMG's -74.61%.

ARHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.26 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARHS and CMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer