ARCC vs. XLY
ARCC (Ares Capital Corporation) is a stock, while XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) is Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, ARCC returned 13.20%/yr vs 12.78%/yr for XLY. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ARCC vs. XLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ARCC having a -2.20% return and XLY slightly higher at -2.16%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ARCC having a 13.20% annualized return and XLY not far behind at 12.78%.
ARCC
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- -2.20%
- 6M
- -2.87%
- 1Y
- -3.87%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.04%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
XLY
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -3.01%
- 1Y
- 11.01%
- 3Y*
- 12.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
ARCC vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -2.20% | 1.07% | 19.78% | 20.03% | -3.84% | 36.14% | 0.86% | 31.30% | 8.81% | 4.50% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -2.16% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | 1.58% | 22.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARCC and XLY is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004 | 0.51 |
The correlation between ARCC and XLY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARCC vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank
ARCC
XLY
ARCC vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARCC | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.10 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 0.67 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 2.05 | -2.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARCC vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARCC drawdown since its inception was -79.36%, which is greater than XLY's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCC and XLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARCC | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.36% | -59.05% | -20.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.35% | -14.98% | -4.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.35% | -26.01% | +6.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.76% | -39.67% | +17.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.77% | -39.67% | -17.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.98% | -6.17% | -4.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.10% | -9.55% | +0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.68% | 4.88% | +5.80% |
Volatility
ARCC vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is 3.72%, while Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that ARCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARCC | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 6.19% | -2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.83% | 13.44% | +1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 18.27% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.96% | 23.83% | -3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.58% | 22.08% | +3.50% |
Dividends
ARCC vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison
ARCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.97%, more than XLY's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 7.48% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARCC and XLY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLY has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to ARCC (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCC dropped -79.36% vs XLY's -59.05%.
XLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARCC and XLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer