PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARCC vs. XLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARCC vs. XLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ARCC having a -2.20% return and XLY slightly higher at -2.16%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ARCC having a 13.20% annualized return and XLY not far behind at 12.78%.


ARCC

1D
1.00%
1M
1.69%
YTD
-2.20%
6M
-2.87%
1Y
-3.87%
3Y*
10.27%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
13.20%

XLY

1D
0.26%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
-2.16%
6M
-3.01%
1Y
11.01%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
12.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARCC vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
-2.20%1.07%19.78%20.03%-3.84%36.14%0.86%31.30%8.81%4.50%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-2.16%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%28.39%1.58%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ARCC and XLY is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004

0.51

The correlation between ARCC and XLY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARCC vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARCC
ARCC Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ARCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARCC Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ARCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARCC Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARCC vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARCCXLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.10

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.26

0.67

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.47

2.05

-2.53

ARCC vs. XLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the XLY Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARCC and XLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARCC vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARCC drawdown since its inception was -79.36%, which is greater than XLY's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCC and XLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARCCXLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.36%

-59.05%

-20.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.35%

-14.98%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-26.01%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

-39.67%

+17.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.77%

-39.67%

-17.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.98%

-6.17%

-4.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.10%

-9.55%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.68%

4.88%

+5.80%

Volatility

ARCC vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is 3.72%, while Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that ARCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARCCXLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

6.19%

-2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.83%

13.44%

+1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.48%

18.27%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.96%

23.83%

-3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.58%

22.08%

+3.50%

Dividends

ARCC vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison

ARCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.97%, more than XLY's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
7.48%9.49%8.77%9.59%10.12%7.65%9.47%9.01%9.88%9.67%9.22%11.02%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.77%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARCC and XLY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLY has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to ARCC (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCC dropped -79.36% vs XLY's -59.05%.

XLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARCC and XLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer