PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARCC vs. BXSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARCC vs. BXSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARCC achieves a -7.09% return, which is significantly higher than BXSL's -8.86% return.


ARCC

1D
-1.05%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
-7.09%
6M
-5.60%
1Y
-8.51%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*
12.43%

BXSL

1D
-1.65%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
-8.86%
6M
-8.91%
1Y
-16.53%
3Y*
5.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARCC vs. BXSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
-7.09%1.07%19.78%20.03%-3.84%0.28%
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
-8.86%-9.36%29.02%37.82%-26.03%32.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ARCC and BXSL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021

0.54

Over the past year, ARCC and BXSL have become more correlated (0.78) than their long-term average of 0.54, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARCC:

$12.81B

BXSL:

$5.39B

EPS

ARCC:

$1.63

BXSL:

$1.80

PE Ratio

ARCC:

10.94

BXSL:

12.91

PS Ratio

ARCC:

4.78

BXSL:

7.55

PB Ratio

ARCC:

0.91

BXSL:

0.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARCC:

$2.63B

BXSL:

$706.98M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARCC:

$1.86B

BXSL:

$831.73M

EBITDA (TTM)

ARCC:

$2.05B

BXSL:

$525.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARCC vs. BXSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARCC
ARCC Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
ARCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARCC Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ARCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARCC Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BXSL
BXSL Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BXSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXSL Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BXSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXSL Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARCC vs. BXSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARCCBXSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.88

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

-0.71

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.79

-1.04

+0.25

ARCC vs. BXSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARCC Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is higher than the BXSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARCC and BXSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARCC vs. BXSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARCC drawdown since its inception was -79.36%, which is greater than BXSL's maximum drawdown of -36.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARCC and BXSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARCCBXSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.36%

-36.80%

-42.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.35%

-23.47%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-24.21%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.44%

-22.64%

+7.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-14.18%

+5.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.85%

15.99%

-5.14%

Volatility

ARCC vs. BXSL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is 4.64%, while Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that ARCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BXSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARCCBXSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

5.32%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.11%

16.51%

-1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.68%

20.26%

-1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.95%

23.82%

-3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.60%

23.82%

+1.78%

Dividends

ARCC vs. BXSL - Dividend Comparison

ARCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.76%, less than BXSL's 13.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
10.76%9.49%8.77%9.59%10.12%7.65%9.47%9.01%9.88%9.67%9.22%11.02%
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
13.26%11.70%9.53%10.64%13.02%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ARCC vs. BXSL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ares Capital Corporation and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
763.00M
0
(ARCC) Total Revenue
(BXSL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ARCC and BXSL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BXSL has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to ARCC (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARCC dropped -79.36% vs BXSL's -36.80%.

ARCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.46 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARCC and BXSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer