PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APXCF vs. NEO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APXCF vs. NEO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) and Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

APXCF is traded in USD, while NEO.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the NEO.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APXCF achieves a -25.26% return, which is significantly lower than NEO.TO's 118.69% return.


APXCF

1D
2.57%
1M
-26.63%
YTD
-25.26%
6M
-35.70%
1Y
103.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NEO.TO

1D
-4.33%
1M
22.55%
YTD
118.69%
6M
105.98%
1Y
262.39%
3Y*
65.20%
5Y*
15.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APXCF vs. NEO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
APXCF
Apex Critical Metals Corp
-25.26%213.05%26.64%
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials Inc.
118.69%111.00%-6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between APXCF and NEO.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2024

0.06

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APXCF vs. NEO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APXCF
APXCF Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
APXCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APXCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
APXCF Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
APXCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
APXCF Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

NEO.TO
NEO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APXCF vs. NEO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) and Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APXCFNEO.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.49

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

8.32

-6.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.56

17.06

-14.50

APXCF vs. NEO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APXCF Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the NEO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APXCF and NEO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APXCFNEO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

4.10

-3.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.21

+0.40

Drawdowns

APXCF vs. NEO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APXCF drawdown since its inception was -66.70%, smaller than the maximum NEO.TO drawdown of -74.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APXCF and NEO.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APXCFNEO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.70%

-74.51%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.70%

-31.76%

-34.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.84%

-4.33%

-61.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.62%

-36.97%

+6.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.57%

15.46%

+25.11%

Volatility

APXCF vs. NEO.TO - Volatility Comparison

Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) and Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) have volatilities of 23.27% and 23.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APXCFNEO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.27%

23.30%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.14%

43.98%

+23.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

114.20%

64.41%

+49.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

128.49%

55.23%

+73.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

128.49%

53.79%

+74.70%

Dividends

APXCF vs. NEO.TO - Dividend Comparison

APXCF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
APXCF
Apex Critical Metals Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEO.TO
Neo Performance Materials Inc.
1.17%2.57%5.01%5.24%4.17%1.97%2.90%4.01%2.47%

Financials

APXCF vs. NEO.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apex Critical Metals Corp and Neo Performance Materials Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


110.00M120.00M130.00M140.00M150.00M160.00M170.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
152.42M
(APXCF) Total Revenue
(NEO.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. APXCF values in USD, NEO.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


APXCF and NEO.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APXCF and NEO.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer