APXCF vs. NEO.TO
APXCF (Apex Critical Metals Corp) and NEO.TO (Neo Performance Materials Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — APXCF in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, NEO.TO in Specialty Chemicals. Over the past year, APXCF returned 103.38% vs 262.39% for NEO.TO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
APXCF vs. NEO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
APXCF is traded in USD, while NEO.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the NEO.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APXCF achieves a -25.26% return, which is significantly lower than NEO.TO's 118.69% return.
APXCF
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -26.63%
- YTD
- -25.26%
- 6M
- -35.70%
- 1Y
- 103.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEO.TO
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- 22.55%
- YTD
- 118.69%
- 6M
- 105.98%
- 1Y
- 262.39%
- 3Y*
- 65.20%
- 5Y*
- 15.34%
- 10Y*
- —
APXCF vs. NEO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
APXCF Apex Critical Metals Corp | -25.26% | 213.05% | 26.64% |
NEO.TO Neo Performance Materials Inc. | 118.69% | 111.00% | -6.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between APXCF and NEO.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2024 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APXCF vs. NEO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
APXCF
NEO.TO
APXCF vs. NEO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) and Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APXCF | NEO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.49 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 8.32 | -6.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.56 | 17.06 | -14.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APXCF | NEO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 4.10 | -3.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.21 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
APXCF vs. NEO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APXCF drawdown since its inception was -66.70%, smaller than the maximum NEO.TO drawdown of -74.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APXCF and NEO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APXCF | NEO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.70% | -74.51% | +7.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.70% | -31.76% | -34.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -74.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.84% | -4.33% | -61.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.62% | -36.97% | +6.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.57% | 15.46% | +25.11% |
Volatility
APXCF vs. NEO.TO - Volatility Comparison
Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) and Neo Performance Materials Inc. (NEO.TO) have volatilities of 23.27% and 23.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APXCF | NEO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.27% | 23.30% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.14% | 43.98% | +23.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 114.20% | 64.41% | +49.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 128.49% | 55.23% | +73.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 128.49% | 53.79% | +74.70% |
Dividends
APXCF vs. NEO.TO - Dividend Comparison
APXCF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APXCF Apex Critical Metals Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NEO.TO Neo Performance Materials Inc. | 1.17% | 2.57% | 5.01% | 5.24% | 4.17% | 1.97% | 2.90% | 4.01% | 2.47% |
Financials
APXCF vs. NEO.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apex Critical Metals Corp and Neo Performance Materials Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
APXCF and NEO.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for APXCF and NEO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer