PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APXCF vs. ARRNF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APXCF vs. ARRNF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) and American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APXCF achieves a -41.30% return, which is significantly lower than ARRNF's 14.24% return.


APXCF

1D
-2.34%
1M
-10.55%
6M
-48.11%
YTD
-41.30%
1Y
44.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
50.63%

ARRNF

1D
-0.87%
1M
-7.37%
6M
-16.56%
YTD
14.24%
1Y
8.32%
3Y*
22.72%
5Y*
64.36%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
45.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.35K$17.28K$39.64K
$114.14K$141.73K$289.87K

APXCF vs. ARRNF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
APXCF
Apex Critical Metals Corp
-41.30%213.05%26.64%
ARRNF
American Rare Earths Limited
14.24%23.89%-25.33%

Correlation

The correlation between APXCF and ARRNF is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2024

0.07

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APXCF vs. ARRNF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

APXCF
APXCF Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
APXCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APXCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
APXCF Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
APXCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
APXCF Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ARRNF
ARRNF Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ARRNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARRNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARRNF Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ARRNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARRNF Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

APXCF vs. ARRNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) and American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APXCFARRNFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.14

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

0.13

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.95

0.17

+0.78

APXCF vs. ARRNF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APXCF Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the ARRNF Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APXCF and ARRNF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APXCF vs. ARRNF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APXCF drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, smaller than the maximum ARRNF drawdown of -83.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APXCF and ARRNF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APXCFARRNFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.63%

-83.01%

+9.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.63%

-69.13%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.17%

-64.74%

-8.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.57%

-46.62%

+13.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.08%

54.42%

-5.34%

Volatility

APXCF vs. ARRNF - Volatility Comparison

Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) has a higher volatility of 14.77% compared to American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF) at 9.36%. This indicates that APXCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARRNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APXCFARRNFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.77%

9.36%

+5.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.49%

39.06%

+19.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

115.29%

116.34%

-1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

125.29%

314.72%

-189.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

125.29%

286.66%

-161.37%

Dividends

APXCF vs. ARRNF - Dividend Comparison

Neither APXCF nor ARRNF has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

APXCF vs. ARRNF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apex Critical Metals Corp and American Rare Earths Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


APXCF and ARRNF have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APXCF has higher volatility (14.77%) compared to ARRNF (9.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APXCF dropped -73.63% vs ARRNF's -83.01%.

APXCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APXCF and ARRNF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer