PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APXCF vs. ALB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

APXCF vs. ALB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APXCF achieves a -28.75% return, which is significantly lower than ALB's 6.57% return.


APXCF

1D
-5.00%
1M
-10.24%
YTD
-28.75%
6M
-35.45%
1Y
105.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ALB

1D
-4.28%
1M
-12.37%
YTD
6.57%
6M
2.75%
1Y
162.90%
3Y*
-10.65%
5Y*
-0.83%
10Y*
8.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APXCF vs. ALB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
APXCF
Apex Critical Metals Corp
-28.75%213.05%26.64%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
6.57%67.72%-11.73%

Correlation

The correlation between APXCF and ALB is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2024

0.04

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APXCF vs. ALB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APXCF
APXCF Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
APXCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APXCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
APXCF Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
APXCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
APXCF Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

ALB
ALB Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ALB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALB Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ALB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALB Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APXCF vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APXCFALBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

5.17

-3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.44

14.71

-12.28

APXCF vs. ALB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APXCF Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the ALB Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APXCF and ALB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APXCF vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APXCF drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, smaller than the maximum ALB drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APXCF and ALB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APXCFALBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.63%

-83.90%

+10.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.63%

-31.72%

-41.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.44%

-51.48%

-15.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.55%

-20.70%

-10.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.38%

11.12%

+32.26%

Volatility

APXCF vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison

Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) has a higher volatility of 25.01% compared to Albemarle Corporation (ALB) at 15.91%. This indicates that APXCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APXCFALBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.01%

15.91%

+9.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

64.07%

42.88%

+21.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

116.36%

62.62%

+53.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

127.80%

54.72%

+73.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

127.80%

48.36%

+79.44%

Dividends

APXCF vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison

APXCF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
1.08%1.15%1.87%1.11%0.73%0.67%1.04%2.01%1.74%1.00%1.42%2.07%
APXCF
Apex Critical Metals Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

APXCF vs. ALB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apex Critical Metals Corp and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.43B
(APXCF) Total Revenue
(ALB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


APXCF and ALB have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APXCF has higher volatility (25.01%) compared to ALB (15.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APXCF dropped -73.63% vs ALB's -83.90%.

ALB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APXCF and ALB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer