APXCF vs. ALB

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

APXCF (Apex Critical Metals Corp) and ALB (Albemarle Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — APXCF in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, ALB in Specialty Chemicals. Over the past year, APXCF returned 44.00% vs 77.20% for ALB. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

APXCF vs. ALB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APXCF achieves a -41.50% return, which is significantly lower than ALB's -15.65% return.

APXCF

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -10.86%
• 6M: -55.00%
• YTD: -41.50%
• 1Y: 44.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 50.14%

ALB

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: -12.43%
• 6M: -27.66%
• YTD: -15.65%
• 1Y: 77.20%
• 3Y*: -14.67%
• 5Y*: -9.44%
• 10Y*: 5.12%
• ALL TIME*: 10.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ALB Albemarle Corporation	$277.50M	$254.33M	$356.96M
APXCF Apex Critical Metals Corp	$15.07K	$17.83K	$38.36K

APXCF vs. ALB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
APXCF Apex Critical Metals Corp	-41.50%	213.05%	26.64%
ALB Albemarle Corporation	-15.65%	67.72%	-11.73%

Correlation

The correlation between APXCF and ALB is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2024	0.03

Return for Risk

APXCF vs. ALB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

APXCF

APXCF Risk / Return Rank: 60
APXCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
APXCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
APXCF Omega Ratio Rank: 65
APXCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
APXCF Martin Ratio Rank: 54

ALB

ALB Risk / Return Rank: 78
ALB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ALB Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ALB Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ALB Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
ALB Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

APXCF vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	APXCF	ALB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	1.31	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	1.92	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.23	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	1.64	-1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.90	4.42	-3.53

APXCF vs. ALB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APXCF Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the ALB Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APXCF and ALB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

APXCF vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APXCF drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, smaller than the maximum ALB drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APXCF and ALB.

Drawdown Indicators

	APXCF	ALB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.63%	-83.90%	+10.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-73.63%	-47.38%	-26.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-74.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-83.90%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-83.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-73.27%	-61.60%	-11.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.65%	-20.84%	-12.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.30%	17.50%	+31.80%

Volatility

APXCF vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison

Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) has a higher volatility of 11.25% compared to Albemarle Corporation (ALB) at 8.93%. This indicates that APXCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APXCF	ALB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.25%	8.93%	+2.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.49%	40.59%	+17.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	115.52%	59.43%	+56.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	125.17%	54.70%	+70.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	125.17%	48.45%	+76.72%

Dividends

APXCF vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison

APXCF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALB Albemarle Corporation	1.36%	1.15%	1.87%	1.11%	0.73%	0.67%	1.04%	2.01%	1.74%	1.00%	1.42%	2.07%
APXCF Apex Critical Metals Corp	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APXCF and ALB in my portfolio?

APXCF and ALB have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, APXCF or ALB?

APXCF has higher volatility (11.25%) compared to ALB (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APXCF dropped -73.63% vs ALB's -83.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.