APH vs. HDV
APH (Amphenol Corporation) is a stock, while HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Over the past 10 years, APH returned 28.45%/yr vs 9.45%/yr for HDV. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
APH vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a 17.84% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 14.07% return. Over the past 10 years, APH has outperformed HDV with an annualized return of 28.45%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.45% annualized return.
APH
- 1D
- -4.23%
- 1M
- 20.35%
- YTD
- 17.84%
- 6M
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- 67.75%
- 3Y*
- 59.47%
- 5Y*
- 37.38%
- 10Y*
- 28.45%
HDV
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- 14.07%
- 6M
- 14.08%
- 1Y
- 21.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
APH vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 17.84% | 96.08% | 41.30% | 31.85% | -11.96% | 35.25% | 22.09% | 34.91% | -6.82% | 31.81% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 14.07% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between APH and HDV is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.52 |
The correlation between APH and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APH vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
APH
HDV
APH vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APH | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.36 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 4.09 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.22 | 11.19 | -4.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APH vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APH | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.41% | -37.04% | -26.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.19% | -5.18% | -23.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.19% | -10.49% | -17.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.73% | -15.42% | -13.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.56% | -37.04% | -0.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.23% | -1.35% | -2.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.55% | -3.08% | -10.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.93% | 1.89% | +9.04% |
Volatility
APH vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a higher volatility of 14.83% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.64%. This indicates that APH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APH | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.83% | 3.64% | +11.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.95% | 7.61% | +29.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.96% | 9.93% | +32.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.86% | 12.81% | +18.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.97% | 15.73% | +12.24% |
Dividends
APH vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than HDV's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.58% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.90% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APH and HDV have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APH has higher volatility (14.83%) compared to HDV (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APH dropped -63.41% vs HDV's -37.04%.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APH and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer