APH vs. AEM
APH (Amphenol Corporation) and AEM (Agnico Eagle Mines Limited) are both stocks. APH operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while AEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, APH returned 28.45%/yr vs 14.05%/yr for AEM. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
APH vs. AEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APH achieves a 17.84% return, which is significantly higher than AEM's -5.12% return. Over the past 10 years, APH has outperformed AEM with an annualized return of 28.45%, while AEM has yielded a comparatively lower 14.05% annualized return.
APH
- 1D
- -4.23%
- 1M
- 20.35%
- YTD
- 17.84%
- 6M
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- 67.75%
- 3Y*
- 59.47%
- 5Y*
- 37.38%
- 10Y*
- 28.45%
AEM
- 1D
- -4.01%
- 1M
- -8.73%
- YTD
- -5.12%
- 6M
- -11.27%
- 1Y
- 32.12%
- 3Y*
- 51.12%
- 5Y*
- 23.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
APH vs. AEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APH Amphenol Corporation | 17.84% | 96.08% | 41.30% | 31.85% | -11.96% | 35.25% | 22.09% | 34.91% | -6.82% | 31.81% |
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | -5.12% | 119.53% | 46.04% | 8.98% | 1.08% | -22.81% | 17.39% | 54.18% | -11.51% | 10.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between APH and AEM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 1991 | 0.10 |
The correlation between APH and AEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
APH:
$204.68B
AEM:
$80.36B
APH:
$4.58
AEM:
$10.60
APH:
34.61
AEM:
15.12
APH:
1.15
AEM:
0.24
APH:
7.86
AEM:
5.97
APH:
14.64
AEM:
3.06
APH:
$25.90B
AEM:
$13.51B
APH:
$9.67B
AEM:
$8.28B
APH:
$7.45B
AEM:
$9.72B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APH vs. AEM — Risk / Return Rank
APH
AEM
APH vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amphenol Corporation (APH) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APH | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.15 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 0.82 | +1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.22 | 2.18 | +4.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APH vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APH drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, smaller than the maximum AEM drawdown of -90.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APH and AEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APH | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.41% | -90.49% | +27.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.19% | -39.39% | +11.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.19% | -39.39% | +11.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.73% | -41.97% | +13.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.56% | -53.86% | +16.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.23% | -36.34% | +32.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.55% | -46.64% | +33.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.93% | 14.80% | -3.87% |
Volatility
APH vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amphenol Corporation (APH) is 14.83%, while Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) has a volatility of 15.80%. This indicates that APH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APH | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.83% | 15.80% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.95% | 36.72% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.96% | 44.70% | -2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.86% | 37.12% | -6.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.97% | 37.41% | -9.44% |
Dividends
APH vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison
APH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than AEM's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1.06% | 0.94% | 2.05% | 2.92% | 3.08% | 2.63% | 2.36% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.89% | 0.86% | 1.22% |
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.58% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% |
Financials
APH vs. AEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amphenol Corporation and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
APH vs. AEM - Profitability Comparison
APH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 7.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
AEM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.
APH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 1.83B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.
AEM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.
APH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 2.35B and revenue of 7.62B, resulting in a net margin of 30.8%.
AEM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
APH and AEM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AEM has higher volatility (15.80%) compared to APH (14.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APH dropped -63.41% vs AEM's -90.49%.
APH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APH and AEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer