APGYX vs. VO

Last updated Jun 10, 2026

APGYX (AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both funds - APGYX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein, while VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, APGYX returned 16.37%/yr vs 11.49%/yr for VO. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. APGYX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.

Performance

APGYX vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APGYX achieves a 2.71% return, which is significantly lower than VO's 9.06% return. Over the past 10 years, APGYX has outperformed VO with an annualized return of 16.37%, while VO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.49% annualized return.

APGYX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: -1.23%
• YTD: 2.71%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 12.33%
• 3Y*: 18.79%
• 5Y*: 10.47%
• 10Y*: 16.37%

VO

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 2.18%
• YTD: 9.06%
• 6M: 9.08%
• 1Y: 17.08%
• 3Y*: 15.95%
• 5Y*: 7.62%
• 10Y*: 11.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APGYX vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
APGYX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class	2.71%	13.25%	25.40%	35.01%	-28.78%	28.92%	34.38%	34.13%	2.22%	31.68%
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF	9.06%	11.62%	15.31%	16.03%	-18.73%	24.70%	18.10%	30.98%	-9.24%	19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between APGYX and VO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004	0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between APGYX and VO has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

APGYX vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APGYX

APGYX Risk / Return Rank: 13
APGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
APGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
APGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
APGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
APGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

VO

VO Risk / Return Rank: 46
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 41
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APGYX vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APGYX	VO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	1.37	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	1.97	-0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.24	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	2.10	-1.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.96	7.96	-5.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APGYX vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APGYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APGYX and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APGYX	VO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	1.37	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.43	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.61	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.50	-0.02

Drawdowns

APGYX vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APGYX drawdown since its inception was -66.33%, which is greater than VO's maximum drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APGYX and VO.

Drawdown Indicators

	APGYX	VO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.33%	-58.87%	-7.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.24%	-8.17%	-7.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.59%	-19.02%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.91%	-27.57%	-6.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.91%	-39.37%	+5.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.44%	-1.68%	-1.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.99%	-7.86%	-13.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.11%	2.15%	+1.96%

Volatility

APGYX vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 3.50%. This indicates that APGYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APGYX	VO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	3.50%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.22%	9.47%	+1.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.59%	12.49%	+2.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.18%	17.62%	+2.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.69%	18.95%	+0.74%

APGYX vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

APGYX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

APGYX vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

APGYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.50%, more than VO's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
APGYX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class	9.50%	9.76%	6.58%	1.65%	0.86%	7.17%	2.59%	3.43%	9.08%	3.77%	2.67%	8.57%
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF	1.37%	1.52%	1.49%	1.52%	1.60%	1.12%	1.45%	1.48%	1.82%	1.35%	1.45%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APGYX and VO in my portfolio?

APGYX and VO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, APGYX or VO?

APGYX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to VO (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APGYX dropped -66.33% vs VO's -58.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.