PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APGYX vs. SEEGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APGYX vs. SEEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APGYX achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly lower than SEEGX's 6.67% return. Over the past 10 years, APGYX has underperformed SEEGX with an annualized return of 16.46%, while SEEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.96% annualized return.


APGYX

1D
-1.45%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
1.98%
6M
3.56%
1Y
12.55%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
16.46%

SEEGX

1D
1.84%
1M
1.92%
YTD
6.67%
6M
6.30%
1Y
19.91%
3Y*
21.91%
5Y*
13.17%
10Y*
19.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APGYX vs. SEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APGYX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class
1.98%13.25%25.40%35.01%-28.78%28.92%34.38%34.13%2.22%31.68%
SEEGX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund
6.67%14.08%35.14%34.62%-25.40%18.17%56.02%39.13%0.50%38.03%

Correlation

The correlation between APGYX and SEEGX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1996

0.94

The correlation between APGYX and SEEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APGYX vs. SEEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APGYX
APGYX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
APGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
APGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
APGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
APGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

SEEGX
SEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APGYX vs. SEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APGYXSEEGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.22

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

1.19

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.94

3.36

-0.41

APGYX vs. SEEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APGYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the SEEGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APGYX and SEEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APGYX vs. SEEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APGYX drawdown since its inception was -66.33%, which is greater than SEEGX's maximum drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APGYX and SEEGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APGYXSEEGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.33%

-62.09%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.24%

-16.82%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.59%

-21.50%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.91%

-31.23%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.91%

-31.85%

-2.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-1.09%

-3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.97%

-16.88%

-4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

5.94%

-1.79%

Volatility

APGYX vs. SEEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX) is 5.19%, while JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that APGYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APGYXSEEGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

6.66%

-1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

12.68%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.90%

16.68%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

20.36%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.72%

21.67%

-1.95%

APGYX vs. SEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APGYX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than SEEGX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

APGYX vs. SEEGX - Dividend Comparison

APGYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.57%, less than SEEGX's 10.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APGYX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class
9.57%9.76%6.58%1.65%0.86%7.17%2.59%3.43%9.08%3.77%2.67%8.57%
SEEGX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund
10.73%11.44%2.00%0.12%3.42%14.92%5.27%12.85%15.97%14.79%9.88%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, APGYX and SEEGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SEEGX has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to APGYX (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APGYX dropped -66.33% vs SEEGX's -62.09%.

SEEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APGYX and SEEGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer