AP vs. TGB

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) and Taseko Mines Limited (TGB).

Performance

AP vs. TGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) and Taseko Mines Limited (TGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AP vs. TGB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AP Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation	35.08%	155.02%	-23.44%	8.76%	-49.80%	-8.76%	82.06%	-2.90%	-75.00%	-25.10%
TGB Taseko Mines Limited	19.61%	191.75%	38.57%	-4.76%	-28.29%	55.30%	175.00%	1.48%	-79.70%	173.38%

Fundamentals

EPS AP : -$0.26 TGB : -$0.09
PS Ratio AP : 0.34 TGB : 3.31
Total Revenue (TTM) AP : $426.31M TGB : $672.90M
Gross Profit (TTM) AP : $85.33M TGB : $175.15M
EBITDA (TTM) AP : $33.95M TGB : $159.70M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AP achieves a 35.08% return, which is significantly higher than TGB's 19.61% return. Over the past 10 years, AP has underperformed TGB with an annualized return of -6.09%, while TGB has yielded a comparatively higher 28.81% annualized return.

AP

• 1D: 7.14%
• 1M: -23.40%
• YTD: 35.08%
• 6M: 220.00%
• 1Y: 238.03%
• 3Y*: 43.24%
• 5Y*: -1.33%
• 10Y*: -6.09%

TGB

• 1D: 4.96%
• 1M: -22.72%
• YTD: 19.61%
• 6M: 61.58%
• 1Y: 195.63%
• 3Y*: 59.77%
• 5Y*: 30.19%
• 10Y*: 28.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AP vs. TGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AP

AP Risk / Return Rank: 91
AP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
AP Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AP Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AP Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
AP Martin Ratio Rank: 89

TGB

TGB Risk / Return Rank: 94
TGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
TGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
TGB Omega Ratio Rank: 91
TGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TGB Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AP vs. TGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) and Taseko Mines Limited (TGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AP	TGB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	2.97	-0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	3.15	-0.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.41	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.56	5.70	-1.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.22	17.80	-7.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AP vs. TGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AP Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the TGB Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AP and TGB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AP	TGB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.67	2.97	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	0.48	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.09	0.44	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	-0.02	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between AP and TGB is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

AP vs. TGB - Dividend Comparison

Neither AP nor TGB has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AP Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.45%	2.69%	7.02%
TGB Taseko Mines Limited	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AP vs. TGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AP drawdown since its inception was -98.06%, roughly equal to the maximum TGB drawdown of -98.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AP and TGB.

Drawdown Indicators

	AP	TGB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.06%	-98.58%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.80%	-35.47%	-15.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.80%	-65.27%	-25.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.96%	-90.76%	-5.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.36%	-50.76%	-30.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.13%	-81.57%	+29.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.67%	11.36%	+11.31%

Volatility

AP vs. TGB - Volatility Comparison

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) has a higher volatility of 35.77% compared to Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) at 21.59%. This indicates that AP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AP	TGB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	35.77%	21.59%	+14.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	64.64%	49.36%	+15.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	89.74%	66.40%	+23.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.75%	62.65%	+11.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.85%	65.92%	+5.93%

Financials

AP vs. TGB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation and Taseko Mines Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation reported a gross profit of 21.35M and revenue of 108.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.

TGB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 124.06M and revenue of 243.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.9%.

AP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation reported an operating income of 1.12M and revenue of 108.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.

TGB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported an operating income of 111.93M and revenue of 243.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.9%.

AP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation reported a net income of -2.21M and revenue of 108.01M, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.

TGB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Taseko Mines Limited reported a net income of 4.45M and revenue of 243.77M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.