AP vs. GROY
AP (Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation) and GROY (Gold Royalty Corp.) are both stocks. AP operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials), while GROY operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, AP returned 11.51%/yr vs -12.68%/yr for GROY. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AP vs. GROY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AP achieves a 99.62% return, which is significantly higher than GROY's -30.69% return.
AP
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 99.62%
- 6M
- 165.34%
- 1Y
- 255.85%
- 3Y*
- 53.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- -0.81%
GROY
- 1D
- -2.44%
- 1M
- -10.83%
- YTD
- -30.69%
- 6M
- -32.69%
- 1Y
- 21.74%
- 3Y*
- 17.18%
- 5Y*
- -12.68%
- 10Y*
- —
AP vs. GROY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AP Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation | 99.62% | 155.02% | -23.44% | 8.76% | -49.80% | -32.07% |
GROY Gold Royalty Corp. | -30.69% | 233.88% | -17.69% | -36.27% | -51.98% | 9.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between AP and GROY is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021 | 0.16 |
The correlation between AP and GROY shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (5 years) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AP:
$215.32M
GROY:
$674.66M
AP:
-$3.37
GROY:
-$0.01
AP:
0.50
GROY:
28.75
AP:
6.87
GROY:
0.93
AP:
$433.03M
GROY:
$19.65M
AP:
$53.11M
GROY:
$14.42M
AP:
$20.56M
GROY:
$9.22M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AP vs. GROY — Risk / Return Rank
AP
GROY
AP vs. GROY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) and Gold Royalty Corp. (GROY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AP | GROY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.11 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.07 | 0.45 | +4.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 1.08 | +10.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AP vs. GROY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AP drawdown since its inception was -98.06%, which is greater than GROY's maximum drawdown of -82.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AP and GROY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AP | GROY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.06% | -82.01% | -16.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.80% | -48.18% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.96% | -48.18% | -32.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.58% | -82.01% | -6.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.46% | -56.94% | -15.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.24% | -55.80% | +3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.43% | 20.24% | +2.19% |
Volatility
AP vs. GROY - Volatility Comparison
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) has a higher volatility of 24.08% compared to Gold Royalty Corp. (GROY) at 16.36%. This indicates that AP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GROY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AP | GROY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.08% | 16.36% | +7.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.36% | 38.13% | +30.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.12% | 56.39% | +29.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.88% | 57.55% | +17.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.90% | 60.23% | +12.67% |
Dividends
AP vs. GROY - Dividend Comparison
Neither AP nor GROY has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AP Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.45% | 2.69% | 7.02% |
GROY Gold Royalty Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.36% | 1.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AP vs. GROY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation and Gold Royalty Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AP vs. GROY - Profitability Comparison
AP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 103.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GROY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Royalty Corp. reported a gross profit of 5.48M and revenue of 7.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.
AP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation reported an operating income of 2.56M and revenue of 103.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.
GROY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Royalty Corp. reported an operating income of 2.64M and revenue of 7.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.7%.
AP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation reported a net income of -867.00K and revenue of 103.13M, resulting in a net margin of -0.8%.
GROY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Royalty Corp. reported a net income of 1.77M and revenue of 7.18M, resulting in a net margin of 24.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AP and GROY have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AP has higher volatility (24.08%) compared to GROY (16.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AP dropped -98.06% vs GROY's -82.01%.
AP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AP and GROY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer