AOTS vs. VGT
AOTS (AOT Software Platform ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - AOTS tracks the AOT VettaFi Software Platform Index while VGT tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AOTS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
AOTS vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOTS achieves a -6.44% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return.
AOTS
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- -6.44%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 31.64%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 60.15%
- 3Y*
- 33.48%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 25.78%
AOTS vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF | -6.44% | -0.83% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 31.64% | -1.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOTS and VGT is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOTS vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
AOTS
VGT
AOTS vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOTS | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.82 | 0.68 | -1.50 |
Drawdowns
AOTS vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOTS drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTS and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOTS | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.95% | -54.63% | +34.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.69% | -1.48% | -6.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.98% | -7.95% | -2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.13% | — |
Volatility
AOTS vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOTS | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.37% | 20.57% | -1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 25.18% | -5.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 24.60% | -5.23% |
AOTS vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOTS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOTS vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
AOTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOTS and VGT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AOTS.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.00% for AOTS.
AOTS tracks AOT VettaFi Software Platform Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: AOT and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AOTS and 0.09% for VGT.
Find the right allocation for AOTS and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer