AOTS vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AOTS (AOT Software Platform ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AOTS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the AOT VettaFi Software Platform Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AOTS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

AOTS vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOTS achieves a -6.44% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.

AOTS

• 1D: -2.67%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: -6.44%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: 32.32%
• YTD: 107.97%
• 6M: 109.04%
• 1Y: 223.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOTS vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF	-6.44%	-0.83%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	107.97%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AOTS and CHPS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2025	0.28

Return for Risk

AOTS vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOTS vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AOTS	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	6.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.82	1.81	-2.63

Drawdowns

AOTS vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOTS drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTS and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOTS	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.95%	-39.44%	+19.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.69%	0.00%	-7.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.98%	-9.16%	-0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.50%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AOTS	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.18%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	28.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.37%	34.43%	-15.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.37%	33.78%	-14.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.37%	33.78%	-14.41%

AOTS vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOTS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOTS vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

AOTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.32%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOTS and CHPS in my portfolio?

AOTS and CHPS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AOTS or CHPS?

On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOTS or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AOTS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOTS or CHPS?

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for AOTS.

What is the main difference between AOTS and CHPS?

AOTS is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. AOTS tracks AOT VettaFi Software Platform Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: AOT and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AOTS and 0.15% for CHPS.