PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOTS vs. AOTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOTS vs. AOTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) and AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOTS achieves a -6.44% return, which is significantly lower than AOTG's 16.75% return.


AOTS

1D
-2.67%
1M
1.97%
YTD
-6.44%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AOTG

1D
-1.35%
1M
14.06%
YTD
16.75%
6M
16.42%
1Y
40.78%
3Y*
29.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOTS vs. AOTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AOTS
AOT Software Platform ETF
-6.44%-0.83%
AOTG
AOT Growth and Innovation ETF
16.75%-1.57%

Correlation

The correlation between AOTS and AOTG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2025

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOTS vs. AOTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOTS

AOTG
AOTG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
AOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOTS vs. AOTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) and AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AOTS vs. AOTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AOTSAOTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.82

0.97

-1.78

Drawdowns

AOTS vs. AOTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOTS drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, smaller than the maximum AOTG drawdown of -31.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTS and AOTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AOTSAOTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.95%

-31.63%

+11.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.69%

-2.31%

-5.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.98%

-7.89%

-2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.92%

Volatility

AOTS vs. AOTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AOTSAOTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.37%

23.90%

-4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.37%

29.28%

-9.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.37%

29.28%

-9.91%

AOTS vs. AOTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOTS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than AOTG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AOTS vs. AOTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither AOTS nor AOTG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AOTS and AOTG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AOTS is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AOTS is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AOTG.

AOTS and AOTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AOTS and 0.75% for AOTG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOTS and AOTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer