AOTS vs. AOTG
AOTS (AOT Software Platform ETF) and AOTG (AOT Growth and Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from AOT. AOTS is passively managed, while AOTG is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AOTS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AOTG.
Performance
AOTS vs. AOTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOTS achieves a -6.44% return, which is significantly lower than AOTG's 16.75% return.
AOTS
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- -6.44%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOTG
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 14.06%
- YTD
- 16.75%
- 6M
- 16.42%
- 1Y
- 40.78%
- 3Y*
- 29.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOTS vs. AOTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF | -6.44% | -0.83% |
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF | 16.75% | -1.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOTS and AOTG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOTS vs. AOTG — Risk / Return Rank
AOTS
AOTG
AOTS vs. AOTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) and AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOTS | AOTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.82 | 0.97 | -1.78 |
Drawdowns
AOTS vs. AOTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOTS drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, smaller than the maximum AOTG drawdown of -31.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTS and AOTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOTS | AOTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.95% | -31.63% | +11.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -22.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.69% | -2.31% | -5.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.98% | -7.89% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.92% | — |
Volatility
AOTS vs. AOTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOTS | AOTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.37% | 23.90% | -4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 29.28% | -9.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 29.28% | -9.91% |
AOTS vs. AOTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOTS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than AOTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOTS vs. AOTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither AOTS nor AOTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AOTS and AOTG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AOTS is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AOTS is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AOTG.
AOTS and AOTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AOTS and 0.75% for AOTG.
Find the right allocation for AOTS and AOTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer