AOTS vs. GINN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AOTS (AOT Software Platform ETF) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - AOTS tracks the AOT VettaFi Software Platform Index while GINN tracks the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AOTS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.

Performance

AOTS vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOTS achieves a -5.28% return, which is significantly lower than GINN's 9.62% return.

AOTS

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 3.51%
• YTD: -5.28%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GINN

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 5.65%
• YTD: 9.62%
• 6M: 8.49%
• 1Y: 25.98%
• 3Y*: 20.41%
• 5Y*: 7.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOTS vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF	-5.28%	-0.83%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	9.62%	-1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between AOTS and GINN is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2025	0.72

Return for Risk

AOTS vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 45
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 45
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOTS vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AOTS	GINN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.69	0.46	-1.15

Drawdowns

AOTS vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOTS drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, smaller than the maximum GINN drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTS and GINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOTS	GINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.95%	-41.25%	+21.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.18%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.25%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.54%	-0.74%	-5.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.95%	-13.36%	+3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AOTS	GINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.38%	16.06%	+3.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.38%	21.32%	-1.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.38%	21.04%	-1.66%

AOTS vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOTS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOTS vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

AOTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.15%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOTS and GINN in my portfolio?

AOTS and GINN have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AOTS or GINN?

On fees, AOTS is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOTS or GINN?

AOTS is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOTS or GINN?

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for AOTS.

What is the main difference between AOTS and GINN?

AOTS tracks AOT VettaFi Software Platform Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: AOT and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AOTS and 0.50% for GINN.