AOTS vs. ASMH

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

AOTS (AOT Software Platform ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - AOTS tracks the AOT VettaFi Software Platform Index while ASMH tracks the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. Both are passively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AOTS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.

Performance

AOTS vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOTS achieves a -5.68% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 71.44% return.

AOTS

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 4.04%
• 6M: -2.25%
• YTD: -5.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASMH

• 1D: -2.11%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 36.58%
• YTD: 71.44%
• 1Y: 143.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOTS vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF	-5.68%	-0.83%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	71.44%	1.47%

Correlation

The correlation between AOTS and ASMH is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025	0.14

Return for Risk

AOTS vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOTS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 95
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOTS vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AOTS	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.37	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.73	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.45	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	9.79	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	28.17	—

Drawdowns

AOTS vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOTS drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTS and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOTS	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.95%	-15.89%	-4.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.94%	-10.51%	+3.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.05%	-4.41%	-5.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AOTS	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	34.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.03%	43.78%	-23.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.03%	41.26%	-21.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.03%	41.26%	-21.23%

AOTS vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOTS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOTS vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

AOTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.

Position	TTM	2025
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF	0.00%	0.00%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.63%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOTS and ASMH in my portfolio?

AOTS and ASMH have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AOTS or ASMH?

On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOTS or ASMH?

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AOTS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOTS or ASMH?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.00% for AOTS.

What is the main difference between AOTS and ASMH?

AOTS tracks AOT VettaFi Software Platform Index, while ASMH tracks ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. They also come from different issuers: AOT and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AOTS and 0.19% for ASMH.