AOTS vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

AOTS (AOT Software Platform ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. AOTS is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AOTS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

AOTS vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AOTS

• 1D: -2.36%
• 1M: -9.00%
• YTD: -15.55%
• 6M: -15.96%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: -3.22%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOTS vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AOTS AOT Software Platform ETF	-9.09%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	13.29%

Correlation

The correlation between AOTS and ARMH is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.37

Return for Risk

AOTS vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Software Platform ETF (AOTS) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

AOTS vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOTS drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, smaller than the maximum ARMH drawdown of -24.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTS and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOTS	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.95%	-24.85%	+4.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.68%	-20.68%	+4.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.13%	-8.89%	-1.24%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AOTS	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.67%	117.02%	-97.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.67%	117.02%	-97.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.67%	117.02%	-97.35%

AOTS vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOTS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOTS vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

Neither AOTS nor ARMH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOTS and ARMH in my portfolio?

AOTS and ARMH have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AOTS or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOTS or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AOTS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOTS or ARMH?

AOTS and ARMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AOTS and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: AOT and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AOTS and 0.19% for ARMH.