PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOR vs. VIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOR vs. VIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOR achieves a 5.83% return, which is significantly lower than VIG's 6.58% return. Over the past 10 years, AOR has underperformed VIG with an annualized return of 8.29%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.05% annualized return.


AOR

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
5.83%
6M
6.57%
1Y
17.08%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
8.29%

VIG

1D
0.03%
1M
2.32%
YTD
6.58%
6M
6.47%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
13.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOR vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
5.83%16.44%10.68%15.75%-15.64%11.19%11.42%18.91%-5.82%15.80%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
6.58%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between AOR and VIG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2008

0.86

The correlation between AOR and VIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

AOR vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AOR
VIG

Technology

27.8%
26.2%

Financial Services

16.2%
20.6%

Industrials

11.9%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
4.7%

Communication Services

8.1%
0.5%

Healthcare

8.0%
16.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
10.1%

Energy

4.3%
3.5%

Basic Materials

4.2%
3.5%

Utilities

2.7%
3.2%

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Technology

AOR
27.8%
VIG
26.2%

Financial Services

AOR
16.2%
VIG
20.6%

Industrials

AOR
11.9%
VIG
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

AOR
9.5%
VIG
4.7%

Communication Services

AOR
8.1%
VIG
0.5%

Healthcare

AOR
8.0%
VIG
16.5%

Consumer Defensive

AOR
5.0%
VIG
10.1%

Energy

AOR
4.3%
VIG
3.5%

Basic Materials

AOR
4.2%
VIG
3.5%

Utilities

AOR
2.7%
VIG
3.2%

Real Estate

AOR
2.4%
VIG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOR vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOR
AOR Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOR Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
AOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOR vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AORVIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

2.33

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.20

9.37

+1.83

AOR vs. VIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the VIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOR and VIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AORVIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

1.82

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.75

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.82

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.60

+0.09

Drawdowns

AOR vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOR drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOR and VIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AORVIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.44%

-46.81%

+22.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.64%

-7.91%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.77%

-14.95%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.72%

-20.39%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.95%

-31.72%

+8.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-1.34%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.47%

-5.51%

+2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.96%

-0.43%

Volatility

AOR vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.42%. This indicates that AOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AORVIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

2.42%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.11%

7.68%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.67%

10.10%

-1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.59%

14.24%

-3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.69%

16.06%

-5.37%

AOR vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AOR vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison

AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than VIG's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOR
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
2.51%2.55%2.66%2.50%2.12%1.64%1.89%2.56%2.49%4.51%2.16%2.12%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.48%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


AOR and VIG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AOR has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to VIG (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOR dropped -24.44% vs VIG's -46.81%.

On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.05% vs 8.29% for AOR. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.05% return vs 8.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AOR.

AOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 1.48% for VIG.

AOR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VIG is Dividend. AOR tracks S&P Target Risk Growth Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AOR and 0.04% for VIG.

AOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOR and VIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer