ANF vs. MSADY
ANF (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) and MSADY (MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK) are both stocks. ANF operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while MSADY operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, ANF returned 18.54%/yr vs 13.31%/yr for MSADY. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ANF vs. MSADY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANF achieves a -26.86% return, which is significantly lower than MSADY's 24.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ANF has outperformed MSADY with an annualized return of 18.54%, while MSADY has yielded a comparatively lower 13.31% annualized return.
ANF
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- 6M
- -8.57%
- YTD
- -26.86%
- 1Y
- -3.41%
- 3Y*
- 36.67%
- 5Y*
- 18.27%
- 10Y*
- 18.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.87%
MSADY
- 1D
- 4.92%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- 6M
- 15.92%
- YTD
- 24.63%
- 1Y
- 37.80%
- 3Y*
- 36.36%
- 5Y*
- 24.66%
- 10Y*
- 13.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.01%
ANF vs. MSADY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | -26.86% | -15.79% | 69.43% | 285.07% | -34.22% | 71.07% | 19.48% | -9.74% | 19.24% | 54.15% |
MSADY MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK | 24.63% | 9.99% | 70.58% | 23.02% | 3.31% | 0.52% | -6.76% | 16.74% | -16.97% | 12.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANF and MSADY is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2010 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
ANF:
$4.09B
MSADY:
$42.37B
ANF:
$10.45
MSADY:
¥540.81
ANF:
8.81
MSADY:
8.81
ANF:
0.00
MSADY:
0.17
ANF:
0.82
MSADY:
0.91
ANF:
3.14
MSADY:
1.44
ANF:
$5.28B
MSADY:
¥7.75T
ANF:
$2.56B
MSADY:
¥5.06T
ANF:
$727.85M
MSADY:
¥782.77B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANF vs. MSADY — Risk / Return Rank
ANF
MSADY
ANF vs. MSADY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) and MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK (MSADY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANF | MSADY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.25 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 2.16 | -2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 5.04 | -5.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANF vs. MSADY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANF drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, which is greater than MSADY's maximum drawdown of -50.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANF and MSADY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANF | MSADY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.59% | -50.41% | -36.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.65% | -17.55% | -28.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.89% | -21.28% | -44.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.93% | -29.89% | -40.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.45% | -33.77% | -38.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.14% | 0.00% | -52.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.94% | -15.30% | -27.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.21% | 7.52% | +18.69% |
Volatility
ANF vs. MSADY - Volatility Comparison
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a higher volatility of 11.65% compared to MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK (MSADY) at 10.14%. This indicates that ANF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSADY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANF | MSADY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.65% | 10.14% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.16% | 21.59% | +11.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.93% | 27.00% | +34.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.09% | 28.55% | +32.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.01% | 25.85% | +35.16% |
Dividends
ANF vs. MSADY - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANF nor MSADY has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% |
MSADY MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK | 0.00% | 2.13% | 2.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.84% | 3.11% | 0.00% |
Financials
ANF vs. MSADY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ANF vs. MSADY - Profitability Comparison
ANF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MSADY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK reported a gross profit of 547.42B and revenue of 1.46T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.4%.
ANF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of -2.76M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
MSADY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK reported an operating income of 182.21B and revenue of 1.46T, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.
ANF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 67.13M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
MSADY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK reported a net income of 132.63B and revenue of 1.46T, resulting in a net margin of 9.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANF and MSADY have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANF has higher volatility (11.65%) compared to MSADY (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANF dropped -86.59% vs MSADY's -50.41%.
MSADY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ANF and MSADY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer