PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSADY vs. ARES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSADY vs. ARES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK (MSADY) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSADY achieves a 30.82% return, which is significantly higher than ARES's -18.86% return. Over the past 10 years, MSADY has underperformed ARES with an annualized return of 13.62%, while ARES has yielded a comparatively higher 27.66% annualized return.


MSADY

1D
-1.92%
1M
11.86%
6M
20.54%
YTD
30.82%
1Y
41.11%
3Y*
38.35%
5Y*
25.34%
10Y*
13.62%
ALL TIME*
8.32%

ARES

1D
3.20%
1M
9.57%
6M
-12.38%
YTD
-18.86%
1Y
-27.00%
3Y*
11.26%
5Y*
16.01%
10Y*
27.66%
ALL TIME*
22.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$300.10M$254.48M$308.65M
$1.61M$1.93M$2.26M

MSADY vs. ARES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSADY
MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK
30.82%9.99%70.58%23.02%3.31%0.52%-6.76%16.74%-16.97%12.03%
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
-18.86%-5.72%52.68%79.52%-12.75%77.75%37.37%110.13%-5.54%10.72%

Correlation

The correlation between MSADY and ARES is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSADY:

$44.47B

ARES:

$42.07B

EPS

MSADY:

¥540.81

ARES:

$2.82

PE Ratio

MSADY:

8.92

ARES:

45.35

PEG Ratio

MSADY:

0.17

ARES:

1.81

PS Ratio

MSADY:

0.92

ARES:

4.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSADY:

¥7.75T

ARES:

$6.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSADY:

¥5.06T

ARES:

$4.46B

EBITDA (TTM)

MSADY:

¥782.77B

ARES:

$2.42B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSADY vs. ARES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSADY
MSADY Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MSADY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSADY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSADY Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MSADY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSADY Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ARES
ARES Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ARES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARES Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ARES Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARES Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSADY vs. ARES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK (MSADY) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSADYARESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.91

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

-0.57

+2.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.62

-1.01

+6.62

MSADY vs. ARES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSADY Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the ARES Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSADY and ARES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSADY vs. ARES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSADY drawdown since its inception was -50.41%, roughly equal to the maximum ARES drawdown of -49.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSADY and ARES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSADYARESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.41%

-49.73%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.55%

-49.05%

+31.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.28%

-49.73%

+28.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.89%

-49.73%

+19.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.77%

-49.73%

+15.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-31.68%

+29.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.27%

-11.58%

-3.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.52%

27.91%

-20.39%

Volatility

MSADY vs. ARES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK (MSADY) is 7.73%, while Ares Management Corporation (ARES) has a volatility of 10.26%. This indicates that MSADY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSADYARESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.73%

10.26%

-2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.71%

36.42%

-14.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.93%

43.02%

-16.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.59%

37.79%

-9.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.81%

36.50%

-10.69%

Dividends

MSADY vs. ARES - Dividend Comparison

MSADY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
4.52%3.29%2.10%2.59%3.57%2.31%3.40%3.59%7.50%5.65%4.32%6.81%
MSADY
MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK
0.00%2.13%2.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.84%3.11%0.00%

Financials

MSADY vs. ARES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK and Ares Management Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

MSADY vs. ARES - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK and Ares Management Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

MSADY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK reported a gross profit of 547.42B and revenue of 1.46T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.4%.

ARES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.1%.

MSADY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK reported an operating income of 182.21B and revenue of 1.46T, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.

ARES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported an operating income of 364.95M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.

MSADY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings PK reported a net income of 132.63B and revenue of 1.46T, resulting in a net margin of 9.1%.

ARES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ares Management Corporation reported a net income of 142.59M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSADY and ARES have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARES has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to MSADY (7.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSADY dropped -50.41% vs ARES's -49.73%.

MSADY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSADY and ARES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer