ANAB vs. COCO

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ANAB (AnaptysBio, Inc.) and COCO (The Vita Coco Company, Inc.) are both stocks. ANAB operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while COCO operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 3 years, ANAB returned 57.31%/yr vs 35.70%/yr for COCO. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

ANAB vs. COCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANAB achieves a 65.10% return, which is significantly higher than COCO's 24.39% return.

ANAB

• 1D: -3.05%
• 1M: -18.45%
• 6M: 68.83%
• YTD: 65.10%
• 1Y: 226.03%
• 3Y*: 57.31%
• 5Y*: 28.35%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.45%

COCO

• 1D: -1.51%
• 1M: -4.41%
• 6M: 23.60%
• YTD: 24.39%
• 1Y: 87.01%
• 3Y*: 35.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 35.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ANAB AnaptysBio, Inc.	$39.97M	$46.98M	$40.05M
COCO The Vita Coco Company, Inc.	$95.25M	$85.05M	$87.09M

ANAB vs. COCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ANAB AnaptysBio, Inc.	65.10%	266.16%	-38.19%	-30.88%	-10.82%	21.89%
COCO The Vita Coco Company, Inc.	24.39%	43.62%	43.90%	85.60%	23.72%	-27.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ANAB and COCO is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021	0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap ANAB : $2.30B COCO : $3.77B
EPS ANAB : -$0.90 COCO : $1.82
PS Ratio ANAB : 6.82 COCO : 5.63
PB Ratio ANAB : 120.10 COCO : 9.93
Total Revenue (TTM) ANAB : $232.39M COCO : $706.02M
Gross Profit (TTM) ANAB : $245.59M COCO : $289.23M
EBITDA (TTM) ANAB : $52.72M COCO : $143.38M

Return for Risk

ANAB vs. COCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ANAB

ANAB Risk / Return Rank: 96
ANAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
ANAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ANAB Omega Ratio Rank: 94
ANAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ANAB Martin Ratio Rank: 97

COCO

COCO Risk / Return Rank: 87
COCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
COCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
COCO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
COCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
COCO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ANAB vs. COCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ANAB	COCO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	1.58	+1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	2.29	+1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.31	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.14	3.77	+4.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.84	9.72	+10.12

ANAB vs. COCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANAB Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the COCO Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANAB and COCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ANAB vs. COCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANAB drawdown since its inception was -92.08%, which is greater than COCO's maximum drawdown of -56.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANAB and COCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANAB	COCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.08%	-56.97%	-35.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.96%	-23.23%	-4.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.32%	-38.55%	-30.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.74%	-21.52%	-16.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.17%	-16.70%	-47.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.45%	9.02%	+2.43%

Volatility

ANAB vs. COCO - Volatility Comparison

AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) has a higher volatility of 27.46% compared to The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) at 14.30%. This indicates that ANAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANAB	COCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.46%	14.30%	+13.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.26%	45.30%	+5.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.55%	55.50%	+18.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.36%	56.79%	+9.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.51%	56.79%	+18.72%

Dividends

ANAB vs. COCO - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANAB nor COCO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANAB and COCO in my portfolio?

ANAB and COCO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ANAB or COCO?

ANAB has higher volatility (27.46%) compared to COCO (14.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANAB dropped -92.08% vs COCO's -56.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ANAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.